anyone wanna make a serious shot at the partypoker jackpot?

[Alobar]

[ QUOTE ]
For now, I'm all for sharing the jackpot evenly. I would like to propose though, that we should just keep what is awarded to us. Whether, it be jackpot or table share. It will be less messy that way.

[/ QUOTE ]

Im of the opinion that since we are all working together, we should all split it equally...sure it creates some problems, but I think its the fairest way

[billyjex]

well i'm on at the waiting list.

[hulk3rules]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
For now, I'm all for sharing the jackpot evenly. I would like to propose though, that we should just keep what is awarded to us. Whether, it be jackpot or table share. It will be less messy that way.

[/ QUOTE ]

Im of the opinion that since we are all working together, we should all split it equally...sure it creates some problems, but I think its the fairest way

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah- split it all up

[KowCiller]

This is the part where some dope emails Party and asks them if organizing an event like this would disqualify the jackpot... in typical MATCHBONUSEP fashion [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

KoW

[MicroBob]

agreed.

[bforester]

I am all for it then.

[dogmeat]

Zimbalives is ready to split any wins evenly. But having a couple not-2+2 at the table is making my play very wierd.

Dogmgeat [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

[Brain]

Definitely.

I liked the checkdown of AA, KK, and my K [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]Q [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

[Alobar]

[ QUOTE ]
Zimbalives is ready to split any wins evenly. But having a couple not-2+2 at the table is making my play very wierd.

Dogmgeat [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

weve got them all but seat 1 and 9

and incase anyone forgets the pot has to be raked to qualify, so if youve got a qualifying hand raise it up on the river

[TheTimeIsUp]

I am in seat 1 now