Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-29-2005, 03:18 AM
Stork Stork is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Just a little bit to your left...
Posts: 65
Default 88 and AQ, tough spots

both at 3/6 6-max on ub, no one playing particularly wild or anything, no pt up:

First hand: MP raises, button cold calls, I call in sb with 88. bb calls too.

flop: 5 5 2 rainbow
checked to mp who bets. button calls, i call, bb drops.

turn: 7, putting two to a suit.
checked again to mp who bets. button drops, I raise, mp 3-bets. is this a standard call down, or should i let go?
----

second hand: I raise AQs in the sb after a couple MP limpers, 4 to the flop.

flop is As Ts 8c
I bet. BB folds, limpers call.

turn: Kh
I bet, both limpers call again.

river: 6c
I bet. First limper folds, second one raises...anyone fold this getting some 11-1 odds?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-29-2005, 03:34 AM
PokerSparky PokerSparky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 2/4
Posts: 228
Default Re: 88 and AQ, tough spots

I showdown both of these hands expecting to lose over 50% of the time.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-29-2005, 03:35 AM
gharp gharp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Utah (sigh)
Posts: 270
Default Re: 88 and AQ, tough spots

[ QUOTE ]
both at 3/6 6-max on ub, no one playing particularly wild or anything, no pt up:

First hand: MP raises, button cold calls, I call in sb with 88. bb calls too.

flop: 5 5 2 rainbow
checked to mp who bets. button calls, i call, bb drops.

turn: 7, putting two to a suit.
checked again to mp who bets. button drops, I raise, mp 3-bets. is this a standard call down, or should i let go?


[/ QUOTE ]
Hmm...this hand looks verrrrrry familiar. So....what was your read on MP? <Ahem>

I'd tend to call it down without one, especially with the flush draw out there.

But are you sure the turn card put two to a suit on board? [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]


[ QUOTE ]

second hand: I raise AQs in the sb after a couple MP limpers, 4 to the flop.

flop is As Ts 8c
I bet. BB folds, limpers call.

turn: Kh
I bet, both limpers call again.

river: 6c
I bet. First limper folds, second one raises...anyone fold this getting some 11-1 odds?

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm definitely not folding this.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-29-2005, 03:43 AM
kidcolin kidcolin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Boston to Sacramento
Posts: 120
Default Re: 88 and AQ, tough spots

I think the first one is a fold against a standard opponent. I might call down against an unknown that I'm suspicious of.

I always try to convince myself that calling in spots like the second one is wrong, but I think you gotta getting 11-1. He could be pulling a move with a busted flush, since I think he'd raise the straight on the turn, and if he's got A6 he's got stones.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-29-2005, 06:25 PM
Stork Stork is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Just a little bit to your left...
Posts: 65
Default Re: 88 and AQ, tough spots

heh sry no strong reads, wasn't paying close enough attention.
actually im not sure the turn put two to a suit up. i'm still having trouble importing ub hand histories so i didn't recheck. I'll take your word for it though that the board was rainbow.
Against a sane opponent, I think I should be folding the turn, I can't think of a single hand I'm beating after the turn 3-bet except maybe A7.

Second hand I think I agree is a call, especially with the third guy folding.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-30-2005, 02:47 AM
gharp gharp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Utah (sigh)
Posts: 270
Default Re: 88 and AQ, tough spots

[ QUOTE ]
heh sry no strong reads, wasn't paying close enough attention.
actually im not sure the turn put two to a suit up. i'm still having trouble importing ub hand histories so i didn't recheck. I'll take your word for it though that the board was rainbow. Against a sane opponent, I think I should be folding the turn, I can't think of a single hand I'm beating after the turn 3-bet except maybe A7.


[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, it was a rainbow turn card:

Ultimate Bet 3/6 Hold'em (5 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx

Preflop: Hero is MP with A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, Button calls, SB calls, BB calls.

Flop: (8 SB) 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
SB checks, BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, Button calls, SB calls, BB folds.

Turn: (5.50 BB) 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, Button folds, <font color="#CC3333">SB raises</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero 3-bets</font>, SB calls.

River: (11.50 BB) 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, SB calls.


Also, I was opening from the CO (effectively) which widens the range a bit. I think you're right that the only hand a reasonable opponent has which you're beating here is A7. But if you didn't know that I was reasonable, I think calling down is OK. A lot of people overplay overcards or smaller pocket pairs here.

But as I think about the hand more, you should probably be raising on the flop (and maybe even 3-betting preflop). If I do have unimproved overs on the flop you want me folding on the turn.


From my point of view, I didn't have much of a read on you either -- and I thought I was paying attention! (I guess the tight players can be the hardest to pick up reads on.) I do remember strongly considering the idea of smooth-calling the flop and raising the river -- I'm not sure if that would've been better or not...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-30-2005, 05:36 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 88 and AQ, tough spots

It's funny/interesting that you guys were playing at the same table. Does this happen a lot on the forums?

I would think that it would be pretty hard for your "villain" to put you on trip 5's, but the 3-bet would indicate that is most likely stronger than a pair of 7s...esp. given that the board is not two flush (I suppose you could be 3-betting a OESD, but much less likely).

3 betting would be good if you think that villian will call down or raise with a worse hand; definitely better than trying to c/r the river which could get checked through. And you lose a bet if you stop and go, which obviously seems stupid to do.

So, yeah, I think 3-betting is probably best here. But, hell, now that I saw the hard in it's full glory I could be results oriented. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-30-2005, 12:53 PM
TheKentock TheKentock is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 13
Default Re: 88 and AQ, tough spots

Hand 1: I would say that a c/r is better on the flop here, but you're not folding either villain with it, and there are a lot more cards that hurt you on the turn than help you. I think calling is good, even though we're likely ahead. on the turn, you hit one of those few cards that doesn't hurt your hand, and I think a c/r was definitely the right move here.

The 3-bet definitely makes me think overpair, but I probably call down here. I'm not saying you should call down, I'm just saying that with an overpair to the board, that's what I would have done.

Hand 2: Call the river. You'll be good 1 time in 10, even if it doesn't seem like it.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-30-2005, 01:48 PM
gharp gharp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Utah (sigh)
Posts: 270
Default Re: 88 and AQ, tough spots

[ QUOTE ]
It's funny/interesting that you guys were playing at the same table. Does this happen a lot on the forums?

[/ QUOTE ]
I don't think it happens too much, but I'm sure it's happened before -- it's the first time it's happened to me, anyway.

[ QUOTE ]
3 betting would be good if you think that villian will call down or raise with a worse hand; definitely better than trying to c/r the river which could get checked through. And you lose a bet if you stop and go, which obviously seems stupid to do.

[/ QUOTE ]
I have position here so I don't have to worry about the river getting checked through. I guess the breakdown of arguments (on my side) is something like:

(a) If my 3-bet forces Villain (Storky) to go in to calldown mode, then it doesn't matter what I do. Though if the river is a 7, I think I'll be happy I got the bets in on the turn.
(b) If my 3-bet causes an aggressive Villain to cap I'm happy since my hand is only behind a full house and it's more likely that he has top pair or a pocket pair.
(c) If my 3-bet causes a wily Villain to fold (say, a pair of 8's) then I'm sad. I might have made more by calling and raising the river.

So I weighed those options and went with 3-betting. I'm still not sure it was right, but it seems better the more I look at it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-30-2005, 06:21 PM
Stork Stork is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Just a little bit to your left...
Posts: 65
Default Re: 88 and AQ, tough spots

[ QUOTE ]
But as I think about the hand more, you should probably be raising on the flop (and maybe even 3-betting preflop). If I do have unimproved overs on the flop you want me folding on the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think 88 has enough equity to warrant a 3-bet against 2-3 opponents from the sb. On the flop, I like calling for the reasons Kentock stated. The pot is too big for a raise to drive out the hands I want out(all of them), and many turn cards could crush me.

I'm still not sure about my call down after your 3-bet, I guess it's just one of those sucky spots in holdem that are hard to play well. I was sure I was beat, in which case I was drawing to 2 outs, but with 10.5BB I couldn't make the fold. Examining the hand now I really should've folded, since my effective odds were much worse (5.75-1) and there isn't really anything I'm ahead of here.

I think you were right to 3-bet the turn as opposed to wait for the river. The only way I'm putting in more than the 2 bets I give you when you 3-bet then bet river is if I fill up. Of course that assumes you know I have an overpair, which you didn't know for sure but makes the most sense for me to have.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.