Do We Have A Thread on Who Is Changing Their Name and Why?

[Eurotrash]

[ QUOTE ]
You didn't send him a PM last time his list was discussed?

[/ QUOTE ]


nah, that would have been dumb. I was curious whether I was on his list or not, but I wasn't going to send him a PM to find out. I think in that other thread about Paluka I jokingly said I should send him a PM, but I never did

[Clarkmeister]

[ QUOTE ]
I just thought for sure that our arguments about Woods/Mickelson would have earned me a spot.


[/ QUOTE ]

Nope. Try harder.

[Voltron87]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
the correct play is to take him off ignore. i dont see why you would be a blowhard about this.

[/ QUOTE ]

How am I being a blowhard? I clearly stated in a thread that I was looking for volunteers, he volunteered, end of story. Frankly, I had forgotten about it, and I don't see him complaining. Why do you care?

[/ QUOTE ]

why do i care? i guess i dont really. matty posts worthwhile stuff, it is not a huge deal or anything he's just not the type of person who should be ignored. saying "i banned him because of a movie vote and now refuse to unban him no matter what" does seem a little blowhardy to me.

[InchoateHand]

I am dumb---I sent him a pm.

[Voltron87]

[ QUOTE ]
I would like to be known as InchoateVoltron.

I'll get on that.

[/ QUOTE ]

any reason?

also, do you have AIM? pm me your sn if you do.

[Clarkmeister]

[ QUOTE ]
"i banned him because of a movie vote and now refuse to unban him no matter what"

[/ QUOTE ]

Where did I say that? Jeez. All I did was try my best to answer someone's question as to what was up.

[kyro]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
the correct play is to take him off ignore. i dont see why you would be a blowhard about this.

[/ QUOTE ]

How am I being a blowhard? I clearly stated in a thread that I was looking for volunteers, he volunteered, end of story. Frankly, I had forgotten about it, and I don't see him complaining. Why do you care?

[/ QUOTE ]

why do i care? i guess i dont really. matty posts worthwhile stuff, it is not a huge deal or anything he's just not the type of person who should be ignored. saying "i banned him because of a movie vote and now refuse to unban him no matter what" does seem a little blowhardy to me.

[/ QUOTE ]

Says the guy who was in favor of permabanning people with shitty movie tastes. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[Soul Daddy]

Can we all agree to never use the name "matty" again?

[Voltron87]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
"i banned him because of a movie vote and now refuse to unban him no matter what"

[/ QUOTE ]

Where did I say that? Jeez. All I did was try my best to answer someone's question as to what was up.

[/ QUOTE ]

i dont need to restablish why you ignored him, and then you said this: "I have pondered the idea of allowing OOT to set one ignore person free when I get to 100." this kind of implies you wouldnt unban anyone. my point is razor thin, and its a dumb argument. but you should unban him.

[Eurotrash]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I just thought for sure that our arguments about Woods/Mickelson would have earned me a spot.


[/ QUOTE ]

Nope. Try harder.

[/ QUOTE ]



well for the record Clark, I'm not actually trying to get on the list. so I guess I'll just be happy that I'm not ignored yet