Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Politics

View Poll Results: No Draw Board
<35% 6 13.33%
35% - 45% 1 2.22%
45% - 55% 3 6.67%
55% - 65% 8 17.78%
65% + 27 60.00%
Voters: 45. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-30-2004, 10:35 PM
Knockwurst Knockwurst is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 3
Default Re: Who does Osama really want to be President?

No, it's you conservatives that don't get it. There is absolute incontrovertible evidence that occupying a muslim country and killing jihadi only begets more jihadi. It's called the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. Look into it. One thing I'll say for liberals, they seem to consider historical antecedents more than conservatives do.

It's not a matter of appeasement. It's called diplomacy and using diplomatic isolation to effect one's ends, and using war as truly a last resort, because it only creates more problems -- regional destabilization, lack of accounting of a regime's weaponary and resettlement of civilian populations.

Once again, military operations should be a last option. It wasn't necessary here and will likely result in negative consequences for the region and the U.S. for many years to come.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-30-2004, 10:53 PM
vulturesrow vulturesrow is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 24
Default Re: Who does Osama really want to be President?

Of course the Russian situation is different in several ways. The most significant of course was the attempt to impose Communism, which is not exactly friendly to any religious freedoms which in a country of strongly religious people, is going to lead to a ton of resistance. Of course look what we have done in Afghanistan. We brought democracy to a place where no one thought it could be done. Look how well the elections went. If there was ever a time for massive terrorist incidents, this would have been it. Nothing significant happened.

You say that regional destabilization is a negative. The problem with that is that is exactly what we want to achieve. We want to challenege the status quo there. We dont the leaders there to think they have a free hand to support terrorists. Also, Arabs respect strength above all. Part of the reason that these terrorist incidents grew over the years is that the US was seen as a paper tiger. They didnt think we would strike back and we finally did. That certainly changes the dynamic when they know they no longer have a free hand to plan and execute terrorist operations.



Tell me again, how do you diplomatically isolate a worldwide confederation of terrorists ? That should be an interesting argument.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-30-2004, 10:54 PM
ACPlayer ACPlayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Foxwoods, Atlantic City, NY, Boston
Posts: 1,089
Default Please dont call it Conservative

Specially as the reason the so called "conservatives" are handing out to justify tens of thousands dead and billions wasted is to hand out democracy to the poor Iraqi's --- I wish you would not tag anti-war heros with the conservative label.

It is not a conservative position to go out nation building while there is much work to be done here. GWB himself said so in 2000.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-30-2004, 10:55 PM
MMMMMM MMMMMM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,103
Default Re: Who does Osama really want to be President?

If we only halfway occupy the country and halfway try to fight the jihadis, you may be right. But we are in more control of Iraq than the Soviets ever were of Afghanistan--and if we would take the kid gloves off and really go after them in Fallujah (and Sadr city, if necessary) we would largely quell the insurgency, in my opinion.

The terrorists and insurgents obviously look forward somewhat to being martyrs, so I say let's speed them on their way. And if some more want to become martyrs too because of that, well we can accomodate them too, can't we? Better to get rid of as many violent crazies as possible, right? And if they are coming out of the woodwork at us, it just makes our job easier if we keep hitting them as fast as they come. Sort of like that arcade game, Pop-A-Weasel, where you try to hit them on the head with a mallet as they pop their heads up out of their holes.

Kill a few jihadis, and you will probably have more jihadis. Kill enough jihadis, though, and you will have LESS jihadis, not more.

Most Iraqis want the country to have a chance and do not want to return to the old dictatorship way of life. We must stay the course and give them that chance they so richly deserve.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-30-2004, 11:09 PM
ACPlayer ACPlayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Foxwoods, Atlantic City, NY, Boston
Posts: 1,089
Default Re: Who does Osama really want to be President?

There is absolute incontrovertible evidence that occupying a muslim country and killing jihadi only begets more jihadi.

It is not just Muslim countries. Try Vietnam for another example. Try all the countries that have been colonized by imperialists and then the imperialists have been thrown out.

The neo-cons pushing for war prefer to think with their, how shall I put this, "other head". While there are plenty of anti-war types who would rather not fight at all -- reasonable thinkers, rather than emotional reactors, know better -- ask Cyrus.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-30-2004, 11:27 PM
Knockwurst Knockwurst is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 3
Default Re: Who does Osama really want to be President?

Vulture -- when I was talking about diplomatic isolation I was talking about Saddam. But in a sense I think we can also seek to isolate the terrorists, though it's much more complicated long-term process, and involves isolating the doctrine of the jihadi, which by the way is being exported from some of the very governments we support such as Saudi Arabia.

Meanwhile, yes -- Afghanistan was a war of last resort, and we had to dismantle the state sponsered terrorism being exported from there. We should assinate terrorists and cut off their funding, but I really don't believe that regional destabilization is a goal we should be engendering. The consequences of a nuclear armed Iran, being the dominant regional power is scary. Are you really willing to go into Iran and occupy it at this point? Even if you wanted to, the Iraqi occupation has taken away any capability to do it, not to mention getting support from other countries now.

AC Player -- sorry about using conservative when I should have used neo-con or hawk. There are many conservatives who have stood up against GWB's Iraq policy: Pat Buchanan, George Will, William Kristol (I think he's come out against the war belatedly), Chuck Hagel, and they should be congratulated for having the balls to go against the Admistration line.

MMMMMM -- isn't it whak-a-mole? Unfortunately, you're right that we can't cut and run now. We've got to see it through to the bitter end, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't try to offer up an honest critique of the Adminstration's Iraq policy. I think you're mistaken about the consequences of going into Falluja. If we kill 10,000 civilians there, which I think is a possibility, it will be remembered as an American-led massacre for many years to come.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-31-2004, 02:01 AM
sam h sam h is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 742
Default Re: Who does Osama really want to be President?

[ QUOTE ]
I'll also note that the liberal view on this seems rather appeasement and fear oriented, as if we ought to be be doing everything possible to "not make them mad at us". I guess you guys still don't get it: they're going to be "mad at us" no matter what we do, and more terrorists are going to be created regardless of how "nice" we are to them. We aren't dealing with rational people here: these are religious nutcases of such conviction and fanaticism that they truly make Jerry Falwell or Pat Robertson look like liberal and open-minded by comparison.

[/ QUOTE ]

But who are "they"? It is certainly true that in Al-Qaeda and other organizations we are dealing with a bunch of religious nutcases bent on our destruction. But most Arabs are not like that, and we need to think about how we might keep them that way.

I don't see how this cannot be seen as an absolutely fundamental prerogative. If we are to succeed, we need to be truthful with ourselves about the forces that are pushing people towards extremism. These include:

A) Despotic governments propped up by us - this topic has been covered pretty extensively and needs no further mention

B) The absence of real states - post-colonial state structures in the middle east are underdeveloped and the governments lack legitimacy in much of the territories they purport to control. This is a huge problem, maybe one without a solution.

B) Enormous economic problems - it is simply a fact that much of the increase in radicalism in this area of the world coincided with the oil bust of the 1980s. Arab nationalism was really a modernizing ideology, and it was discredited among many once things fell apart economically.

C) Demographics - these are very young populations, and young men who are serially unemployed and see no prospects in life tend to be pretty good marks for extremist recruiters

D) Serious anger about perceived American imperialism - like it or not, our actions in Iraw and Afghanistan have provoked enormous resentment, as has our complete unwillingness to own up to our checkered history of intervention in the region during the cold war.

One big problem is that, out of interest in their own survival, politicians in America simply cannot acknowledge two things. The first is that part of this mess is of our own making, through a long history of misguided interventions and shady deals with tyrants, not to mention more recent policy. The second is that so much of this mess is actually completely out of our control. The structural factors like the absence of real states in the region and underdeveloped economies are the ultimate sources of problems. And there is no policy prescription for dealing with them.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-31-2004, 05:58 AM
GWB GWB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: A nice little white house with a garden of roses. Will return to my Crawford ranch in 5 years after my Second Term. Vote for me on November 2nd. Wish me luck.
Posts: 248
Default Re: Who does Osama really want to be President?

[ QUOTE ]
The best part is GWB thought this poll was going to come out with Kerry being ahead.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, I do polls from time to time just to remind myself how liberal 2+2 is (at least those that visit this forum). I'd go bonkers if I thought this forum reflected the country at large.

ps - keep posting here after the election is over. There is more to life than just bonus whoring. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-31-2004, 09:45 AM
Kurn, son of Mogh Kurn, son of Mogh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cranston, RI
Posts: 4,011
Default Re: Who does Osama really want to be President?

The fact that 71% of the people didn't choose "he doesn't care" is evidence of either mass ignorance or partisan stupidity.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-31-2004, 03:45 PM
QuadsOverQuads QuadsOverQuads is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26
Default It\'s not even close : it\'s Bush, by a mile.


As far as bin Laden and his ilk are concerned, Bush is the gift that keeps on giving.

q/q
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.