overpair JJ facing heavy flop action

[curtains]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't really put people on ranges, or at least if I do, its all subconsious. My range for him is that probably he can't beat JJ, but sometimes he can. However not enough so that you shouldn't move allin.

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm guessing this gets back to your previous main focus of multi-tabling SNGs. While you can't always take the time to put your opponent on a range of hands, when the decision is for all your chips you better take the time. Not doing so will severely impact your ability to consistently do well in MTTs - IMHO.

[/ QUOTE ]


I don't think so at all. Once you are experienced you can put people on ranges subconsciously. I don't have to sit here and try to figure out every possible hand this guy could have. I've been in this spot many times before and am experienced enough to handle it.

Also I don't think you realize just how elementary it is to play 4 MTTs at once, compared to what I'm used to playing. I doubt if it would affect my results in the slightest. Once I play upwards of 6, then there might be some impact.

Let's put it this way, I know for sure that after I put this guy on a "range", I would move allin. I don't have to waste my time and actually figure out every possible hand this player might have. Also it's not easy to put the morons that we play against every day on a range. It's not as though you can expect them to be rational most of the time.

[Lloyd]

Ok. Maybe do a post on this and see what others think. While you could certainly be an exceptional exception, most of the people I respect would probably say that taking the time to put someone on a range of hands during a critical moment is essential.

[curtains]

[ QUOTE ]
Ok. Maybe do a post on this and see what others think. While you could certainly be an exceptional exception, most of the people I respect would probably say that taking the time to put someone on a range of hands during a critical moment is essential.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't consider this moment critical. And my point is that I can do it unconsiously. When you have enough experience you don't have to treat every situation as though its the first time you've seen it. I can draw back on my knowledge of many similar types of hands, and use it to draw faster conclusions than most whom have less experience or whom have done less work on poker.

[Lloyd]

You don't think making a decision for all your chips is critical? All I know is that guys like Harrington, Lederer, and Fossilman have given countless examples of putting people on a range of hands during play. Like I said, I guess you're the exceptional exception.

[curtains]

[ QUOTE ]
You don't think making a decision for all your chips is critical? All I know is that guys like Harrington, Lederer, and Fossilman have given countless examples of putting people on a range of hands during play. Like I said, I guess you're the exceptional exception.

[/ QUOTE ]


If your decision is whether or not to call an allin preflop with AA, would that be critical too? Would it be critical to call an allin with top set on the flop?

The decision has to be a relatively close one before it becomes critical. In this type of tournament, in this spot, this would not be a close decision to me.

Also I suspect that plenty of the hands these above mentioned players have put forth in their book, are not close or difficult decisions for them either, however they go over all the ranges for the novice players who need to learn to think in this manner.

Of course sometimes you have to try your best to put your opponent on a range of possible hands. However the way it's done on here I find is not very effective. People just seem to give a list of possible hands without taking into effect the frequency in which their opponents will have one set of hands over the other.

People also often seem to forget that there is always a decent % chance that your opponent is a moron,that these hand rages are way way off, and your opponent could have some random nonsense.

I see too many attempts on 2+2 to put some random player from a $11 rebuy tournament on very narrow/specific range of hands.

Anyway I'm not making my point very well, I just think that the whole hand range thing is overdone/overemphasized. Sometimes you will come up with a range where every logical hand your opponent could have would lead you to fold. However it's rare that I see people on 2+2 take into account that their opponent may be completely illogical or insane, as is the case with many MTT opponents that we will face online.

[curtains]

Anyway I'm probably being stupid. Hand ranges are important, however one should be able to make a good estimate extremely quickly and unconsciously, especially online. Doing harder work on them in advance is probably a decent idea as it should lead you to make quicker decisions when necessary.

Most of the time when I see proposed hand ranges on 2+2 I think they are bogus, yet see almost no one correcting the suggestions.

Sometimes you just have to know what the right play is without having to resort to such tedious methods. It depends on the situation and the level of experience that the player has. However if you ask a hand range, and some strong player doesn't feel like its necessary to give a specific one, they probably don't need to.

[gumpzilla]

[ QUOTE ]
However it's rare that I see people on 2+2 take into account that their opponent may be completely illogical or insane, as is the case with many MTT opponents that we will face online.

[/ QUOTE ]

Insane or illogical people will hold a range of cards too, it will just be incredibly wide.

I agree with a lot of what you're saying, but again I think there's a pretty big difference between doing it at the table and doing it when looking at things after the fact. To make an analogy from SNG analysis, there are a lot of times where you will feel ICM analysis of a situation is unnecessary because you don't need it. That doesn't make the analysis wrong or irrelevant.

[curtains]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
However it's rare that I see people on 2+2 take into account that their opponent may be completely illogical or insane, as is the case with many MTT opponents that we will face online.

[/ QUOTE ]

Insane or illogical people will hold a range of cards too, it will just be incredibly wide.

I agree with a lot of what you're saying, but again I think there's a pretty big difference between doing it at the table and doing it when looking at things after the fact. To make an analogy from SNG analysis, there are a lot of times where you will feel ICM analysis of a situation is unnecessary because you don't need it. That doesn't make the analysis wrong or irrelevant.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah I hear you, just something about the way it's gone about here bugs me a bit. Take a look at the play a hand with the masters thing preflop.

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...t=all&vc=1

We are trying to put the cutoff on a range?

They could have practically anything!! They are limping in on the cutoff with over 100x the BB. You can't immediately put someone on a range here. What I'm saying is that its just not the most relevant thing to talk about in such a situation. Sometimes it's important, sometimes it's not.

It's also not important because you can usually eliminate like 80-90% of the possible hands after there is some postflop action.

Anyway despite all this I'm sure that I'm putting my opponent on a range by thinking that they could have virtually any 2 cards, and I see that some people gave ranges that were way too tight and thus need work in this department, although almost none of them were corrected.

[Exitonly]

i'm with curtains here... i'm not claiming to have his experience, or that i never try and put my opponents on ranges... but typically when i'm playing it's on 'instinct' orbasically my past experiences. When i review/analyse plays later that's when i start putting them on ranges and doing the math and such.

Oh, but i do keep the 'Powertoys Calculat' open while i play.. so i's not ALL instinct.