|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m a major LAG
[ QUOTE ]
I think that if you really look deep into it that there is justification for my play. I think playing for set value when the guy has about 9 BBs is pretty thin. I mean nobody's limping 44 here are they? [/ QUOTE ] So you are assuming no one else (inlcuing the blinds) will limp along behind improving your implied odds? Regards, Woodguy |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m a major LAG
Good point that I didn't give much thought due to the general tendencies of these tourneys at this stage. All of you know it's very unlikely to be a limpfest and be 6 or 7 to the flop. I would expect maybe 1 more limper and then both blinds. That does make limping more appealing for sure.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m a major LAG
[ QUOTE ]
Good point that I didn't give much thought due to the general tendencies of these tourneys at this stage. All of you know it's very unlikely to be a limpfest and be 6 or 7 to the flop. I would expect maybe 1 more limper and then both blinds. That does make limping more appealing for sure. [/ QUOTE ] Its true that its likely that someone may pop it behind you, but if others have the same read, it may get limped to the blinds. Its worth 1BB to try. Regards, Woodguy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m a major LAG
ian: TT-QQ/AK. your action now?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m a major LAG
I'm guessing that w/ JJ, QQ, and AK, I'd probably make a raise w/o even considering it, and then end up hating myself when we get all in vs. AA. TT seems really close to 99 in the way I'd look at it after his limp. Maybe I would have limped TT just cause it's TT. I don't know. This is such an unusual fold for me that I don't really know what I was doing. Sure felt right though.
|
|
|