|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Paying a homeless person to eat dog poop
In the politics forum someone mentioned that the guy who made Supersize This used to pay homeless people $100 to eat dog poop and videotape it. Do you think that this is immoral?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Paying a homeless person to eat dog poop
It's definitely not to be looked well upon, but it's pure capitalism.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Paying a homeless person to eat dog poop
Where does one find these videos?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Paying a homeless person to eat dog poop
This response bothers me more than the video.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Paying a homeless person to eat dog poop
This reminds me does anyone remember that guy who got in trouble for paying homeless people to fight? He would videotape them and sell the videos. He sold a crapload but got busted.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Paying a homeless person to eat dog poop
[ QUOTE ]
This reminds me does anyone remember that guy who got in trouble for paying homeless people to fight? He would videotape them and sell the videos. He sold a crapload but got busted. [/ QUOTE ] yes bumfights? I think you can still DL on limewire |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Paying a homeless person to eat dog poop
Not that i would get a thrill out of watching it but still would be nice to know just something came up where i really needed to gross peopel out.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Paying a homeless person to eat dog poop
[ QUOTE ]
Not that i would get a thrill out of watching it but still would be nice to know just something came up where i really needed to gross peopel out. [/ QUOTE ] you could probably accomplish that by opening a can of wipe-ass on them. cheers! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Paying a homeless person to eat dog poop
[ QUOTE ]
It's definitely not to be looked well upon, but it's pure capitalism. [/ QUOTE ] Are you suggesting that "pure capitalism" excuses immorality? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Paying a homeless person to eat dog poop
[ QUOTE ]
Are you suggesting that "pure capitalism" excuses immorality? [/ QUOTE ] I'd imagine that what he was saying was that it was a voluntary exchange of cash for services. The services rendered aren't by themselves inherently immoral, unless you have strong feelings about the sentience of dog poop. One can debate whether it was truly a voluntary exchange, perhaps, but I think that if you accept that it was then it's hard to find too much immoral about it. It's definitely distasteful, though - literally! Wocka wocka wocka. |
|
|