|
|
#1
08-12-2005, 11:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
LAG post in response to flynn\'s challenge
5-5 NL
2 limpers, button ($1300) opens for 30, i (6k) call from BB with 2 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]4 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. Both limpers call. Botton is a tight / bad player who's not usually very creative. I have a fairly tight image. Flop: 2 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]6 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]6 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] I check, check, check, button bets $50 which i interpret as weakness. I raise to $175, fold, fold, button reraises to $375. Now I think he's got an overpair so i move allin....He calls quickly with 5 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]6 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] and i hit running hearts to win the hand 
|
|
#2
08-12-2005, 11:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LAG post in response to flynn\'s challenge
you suck out g00t
|
|
#3
08-12-2005, 11:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LAG post in response to flynn\'s challenge
uuuhhhh.... when he 3-bets your ass, it's time to fold. I'm really not too much against the check raise if you think you can get a fold a good amount of the time, but when he 3-bets your ass, it's time to give him credit for a 6, and cut your losses.
This is just chip spewing.
|
|
#5
08-12-2005, 11:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LAG post in response to flynn\'s challenge
[ QUOTE ]
I did not think he had a 6.... [/ QUOTE ] who cares, he already invested enough in the pot that he was not folding. So you were either value betting your hand, or paying off another hand. Also, people stop posting results in threads. It really messes up replies.
|
|
#6
08-12-2005, 11:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LAG post in response to flynn\'s challenge
uh, about the definition of "LAG...." ;-)
Mainly what I was thinking about was selective aggression, particularly playing harder at more pots to take a few extra down and encourage calls when you do have it. Things like when to call the flop with nothing but position so you can bet or raise the turn on a pure bluff. That is LAG but can be effective / mathematically correct against the right players. Matt
|
|
#7
08-12-2005, 11:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LAG post in response to flynn\'s challenge
[ QUOTE ]
who cares, he already invested enough in the pot that he was not folding. So you were either value betting your hand, or paying off another hand. [/ QUOTE ] I don't know how you can make this kind of statement knowing absolutely nothing about the villian in question. I do stuff like this fairly infrequently and almost never get caught. As a matter of fact, i get caught so infrequently that i'm pretty sure that i should be making these types of plays more often. [ QUOTE ] Also, people stop posting results in threads. It really messes up replies. [/ QUOTE ] Wasn't really meant to be an educational post...I just thought it was kinda funna.
|
|
#9
08-12-2005, 11:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LAG post in response to flynn\'s challenge
[ QUOTE ]
LOL...yea, i knew what you meant....Your post just reminded me about that hand and i thought it was pretty funny so i posted it. [/ QUOTE ] well you were WRONG. (jk?)
|
|
#10
08-13-2005, 12:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LAG post in response to flynn\'s challenge
Way to be a dick, Fslexcduck.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
