#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Genreal ? about SC in small stakes games.
Especially for the hands you normally don't play.
53s shows up as my 4th best hand, but I've had 3 huge pots that I've won with it, and never play it otherwise really. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Genreal ? about SC in small stakes games.
Excellent points.
My one observation however is that you don't mention position once (except that position is a prereq for apply the 5 and 10 rule). If people are automatically playing SCs from MP/EP then they are probably pissing away money, but if the stacks are deep enough I think it is a minor error at the most. Many over-value SCs. But when I review hands/sessions where I have lost some big pots with them I noticed three things: (1) I'm playing to loose in EP (2) I'm playing too tight in LP (3) And, most importantly, I am playing like a doink (term of art) after the flop. My current belief is that once the stacks are 100xBB+ nothing really that interesting happens preflop in position. OOP, starting hands can be debated a bit but beyond the obvious any leaks here are going to be minor if you play well after flop. JMO. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Genreal ? about SC in small stakes games.
Why not just check your PT nos and see if they are +EV from various positions?
If you are making money with them then keep playing em |
|
|