Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > Multi-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-09-2005, 10:47 PM
Roman Roman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 384
Default So I prolly shouldn\'t be trying this without reads

100$ MTT, havent been paying attention so no reads:

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t30 (10 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx

UTG+1 (t1155)
UTG+2 (t735)
Hero (t1080)
MP2 (t2045)
MP3 (t1410)
CO (t2070)
Button (t4015)
SB (t810)
BB (t1205)
UTG (t1745)

Preflop: Hero is MP1 with K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].
[color=#666666]1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls t30, [color=#666666]1 fold</font>, [color=#CC3333]Hero raises to t135</font>, [color=#666666]6 folds</font>, UTG+1 calls t105.

Flop: (t315) 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] [color=#0000FF](2 players)</font>
UTG+1 checks, [color=#CC3333]Hero bets t150</font>, [color=#CC3333]UTG+1 raises to t425</font>, [color=#CC3333]Hero raises to t700</font>

Is this just retarded?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-09-2005, 10:51 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: So I prolly shouldn\'t be trying this without reads

It's a good spot for it, but you need to know either that he's bluffing here a good % of the time or that he'd fold a J here a good % of the time. I don't know why you raised so small, as that's just asking a flush draw to stick around, putting you in a horrible spot on any non-A, non-K turn.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-09-2005, 11:12 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: So I prolly shouldn\'t be trying this without reads

Yes. Did he push?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-10-2005, 08:19 AM
ansky451 ansky451 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 24
Default Re: So I prolly shouldn\'t be trying this without reads

In my experience in party 100s, at least early on, people do not fold top pair.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-10-2005, 01:42 PM
schwza schwza is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 113
Default Re: So I prolly shouldn\'t be trying this without reads

[ QUOTE ]
In my experience in party 100s, at least early on, people do not fold top pair.

[/ QUOTE ]

i'm sure plenty of people are folding top pair, but you (duh) don't see it when it happens.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-10-2005, 02:15 PM
ansky451 ansky451 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 24
Default Re: So I prolly shouldn\'t be trying this without reads

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
In my experience in party 100s, at least early on, people do not fold top pair.

[/ QUOTE ]

i'm sure plenty of people are folding top pair, but you (duh) don't see it when it happens.

[/ QUOTE ]

Indeed.

But in general when I try bluffs like this, I get called by J9o a lot.

Of course, there is that whole selective memory thing.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-10-2005, 02:17 PM
Jason Strasser Jason Strasser is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 71
Default Re: So I prolly shouldn\'t be trying this without reads

As always, great reasoning has been provided for this play.

Roman, explain your thought process.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-10-2005, 02:17 PM
adanthar adanthar is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 27
Default Re: So I prolly shouldn\'t be trying this without reads

It's not that I haven't done this, but you generally want a deeper stack when you do, and a sense that he's at least capable of bluffing a J44 board without a pair.

Here, he's (probably) not gonna go away after putting half his stack in.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-10-2005, 02:38 PM
McMelchior McMelchior is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 66
Default Re: So I prolly shouldn\'t be trying this without reads

With the opponent holding J-X, X not being Ace or King, you have approximately 29% equity with you two overs and back-door flush draw.

Pot size after villian's raise t890.

If you push to villian raise you're getting a total of t2,205 (2 x your initial stack plus the blinds) for your remaining t795 should you win:

71% x 0 = 0
29% x t2,205 = t639.

Net loss: t156

So you need villian to fold t156/t890 = 17.5% of the time (or less than one out of five) to make a push break-even.

I believe that's possible, but you're probably mainly increasing your variance without increasing your equity. (I don't understand the re-raise to t700, leaving yourself with t95 is basically reducing equity - or am I getting something completely wrong here?)

Best,

McMelchior (Johan)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-10-2005, 04:32 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: So I prolly shouldn\'t be trying this without reads

He has no reason since he has no reads, he thinks that his opponent is thinking that its a paired flop and my opponent probably didn't hit so i'm going to check raise him off his hand. Therefore Roman thinks his AK should be best enough of the time to make the reraise, or thats what i think at least. Maybe he wasn't thinking since he had no reads and just made this bet on instincts.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.