|
|
#1
12-07-2005, 10:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
What\'s the deal with 20/40??
How come everywhere I go 20/40 seems to be the weirdest/craziest game? I've played in numerous casinos where the 10/20 players are alright usually on the passive side but the 20/40 players are the craziest and sometimes worst SOB's around.
Recently I moved up from party 10/20 full ring to 20/40 and the quality of play is noticeably worse. Any thoughts as to why this sudden fall in skill? Just curious. 
|
|
#2
12-07-2005, 12:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What\'s the deal with 20/40??
the 20/40 is much better then any level below it, you will find this to be true once you play enough hands to have a reasonable sample size... the same will be true with every level you move up from here on out
|
|
#3
12-07-2005, 12:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What\'s the deal with 20/40??
I have noticed this in live games a lot. I think the a reason for it is because 20/40 is often considered the borderline between low limit and mid limit games. 20/40 players feel they are now the big fish and play a more LAGgy style to show off their impressive plays.
|
|
#5
12-07-2005, 05:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What\'s the deal with 20/40??
[ QUOTE ]
I have a thought. How about we not post where good games are so they stay that way longer. - Jim [/ QUOTE ] becuase SSers are gonna rush to 20/40 to get in on the action? Let 'em. I'll take their money too. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#7
12-07-2005, 07:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What\'s the deal with 20/40??
I [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] live 20/40. I've played in great games here in the beautiful Pacific Northwest, in California (Commerce, Bike), in AC (Borg), in Vegas (Mirage). All were lots of fun.
|
|
#8
12-08-2005, 12:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What\'s the deal with 20/40??
Aggressive games are tougher than passive games. I've played in both 10-20 and 20-40 games, and in my opinion, people wrongly equate loose aggressive play with soft games. Loose passive games are soft games.
|
|
#9
12-08-2005, 12:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What\'s the deal with 20/40??
[ QUOTE ]
Aggressive games are tougher than passive games. I've played in both 10-20 and 20-40 games, and in my opinion, people wrongly equate loose aggressive play with soft games. Loose passive games are soft games. [/ QUOTE ] I agree with this. However, in my opinion loose passive games are boring games and loose aggressive games are fun games.
|
|
#10
12-08-2005, 01:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What\'s the deal with 20/40??
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Aggressive games are tougher than passive games. I've played in both 10-20 and 20-40 games, and in my opinion, people wrongly equate loose aggressive play with soft games. Loose passive games are soft games. [/ QUOTE ] I agree with this. However, in my opinion loose passive games are boring games and loose aggressive games are fun games. [/ QUOTE ] My ulcers disagree.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
