Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid-High Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-30-2005, 09:56 PM
TheMetetron TheMetetron is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 92
Default Re-learning how to laydown top pair... standard?

No PT stats and 8 tabling isn't conducive to regular reads.

I've been 12-tabling $5/10 short on non-Party sites for the past 2-3 weeks, so I just want to re-establish some things for myself.

This is standard right?

Party Poker 10/20 Hold'em (6 max, 6 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is CO with Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, BB calls.

Flop: (4.50 SB) 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero 3-bets</font>, BB calls.

Turn: (5.25 BB) 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises</font>, Hero folds.

Final Pot: 8.25 BB
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-30-2005, 10:29 PM
joseki joseki is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: triage
Posts: 46
Default Re: Re-learning how to laydown top pair... standard?

I think this is probably a good fold, as it's hard to put him on a hand other than 22/44 or perhaps a small ace. Even so, I'd likely call down an unknown, as there aren't too many hands that beat you and there are plenty of wacky players in this game.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-30-2005, 10:40 PM
Lurker4 Lurker4 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Urbana, IL
Posts: 217
Default Re: Re-learning how to laydown top pair... standard?

Without reads I think I at least call the turn getting 8-1, due to you possibly having 3-9 outs to win, nearly always 4 to tie, and the small possibility being ahead to a bluff/semibluff that will give up on the turn once you call, thinking you will likely showdown. A2-A5 plays this way as as much as 22/44 since your line looks like a strong ace, and there are 18 combos of the two-pair aces against which you have on average 8 outs against, and only 6 combos of the hands you are only drawing to a split against.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-30-2005, 11:33 PM
adamstewart adamstewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 385
Default Re: Re-learning how to laydown top pair... standard?

Tough decision here. In actual play, I doubt I'd have the discipline to even think about laying this down.


You're getting 8:1 for your turn call. Assuming all of your outs are clean, that's even money for a call to try to improve your hand to two-pair or trips. However, your 5 potential outs are not always clean here, obviously, as villain often already has hands like 44, 22, A4, A2 .... In which case, you really don't have much in the way of implied odds as you can't be confident about raising the river even when you do hit your hand.

On the other hand, you may have the best hand here. After all, you did open-raise from the CO position, and BB may take this as a steal attempt. So, he could be overplaying hands like AJ, AT, A9 ...


Considering all of the above, it's probably a close call, but I think FOLDING (as you did) is the best play. You've shown a lot of strength throughout this hand, including a flop 3-bet, yet this guy is continuing to check-raise you on the turn (often indicative of a stronger hand). It just seems like more than not he's gonna have two-pair or a set.


Having said all that, again, I'm still not sure I'd be able to lay this down in actual play, while multi-tabling. But then again, hopefully I've learned something from my own response to this thread. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]


Nice hand.



EDIT: Just read one of the others' responses and realized you have an additional 4 potential outs for a gutshot.

Thus, disregard my entire above post. These additional outs make this an easy call on the turn. Then, on the river, you should probably call down getting 10:1 with Top-Pair-2nd-Kicker.

I've left the original post intact. As it answers a related question: What would you do without the gutshot draw?




Adam
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-01-2005, 12:12 AM
oreogod oreogod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Irregular, Regular
Posts: 405
Default Re: Re-learning how to laydown top pair... standard?

Well here is the real story, morning glory. I did a weighed outs division, and it look like at most u had 3-4outs, (counting the gutshot as 2 outs, because u are not playing for the whole pot, only half).

Now I do a Pstove analysis...as seen below:


Majority Range:

17,820 games 0.110 secs 162,000 games/sec

Board: 2h As 4c
Dead:

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 16.7144 % 15.49% 01.23% { AhQs }
Hand 2: 83.2856 % 82.06% 01.23% { 44, 22, A4s, A2s, A4o, A2o }


Minority Range: (if u felt so inclined u could add A3 in and that would boost equity to 35 percent)

32,670 games 0.020 secs 1,633,500 games/sec

Board: 2h As 4c
Dead:

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 25.7821 % 24.76% 01.03% { AhQs }
Hand 2: 74.2179 % 73.19% 01.03% { A5s, 53s, 42s, A5o, 53o, 42o }


Okay, so now what?:

Do a sweet little calc as follows...giving majority range full reign 90 percent of the time and the minority 10 percent of the time and we get:

.9(16.75) + .1 (25.78) = 15.08+2.58 = 17.66 percent equity which ~4.66:1 odds to improve or effective odds to call down (meaning if u wanted to call down to showdown, ud need 4.66:1 effective odds calling a turn and river bet.).

Conclusion: By no means is this the a thread ender (it might be, dunno), but when I first read your hand, I was not a big fan of the fold. Going by the math of Pstove, I still dont like it. The only reservations are the weighed division I did before Pstove which gave u 3-4 outs. I wonder how Pstove calculates split pot outs, as this could effect the math a bit. Anyway, thats my two cents.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-01-2005, 12:45 AM
Victor Victor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: cleveland
Posts: 68
Default Re: Re-learning how to laydown top pair... standard?

no freakin way i fold without a read.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-01-2005, 01:10 AM
Lmn55d Lmn55d is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5
Default Re: Re-learning how to laydown top pair... standard?

i dont fold either
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-01-2005, 02:33 AM
ddubois ddubois is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 97
Default Re: Re-learning how to laydown top pair... standard?

It's not a huge part of his range, but worse one-pair aces play this way when they are suited in clubs. I think you have too many hidden outs to fold.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-01-2005, 04:43 AM
Victor Victor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: cleveland
Posts: 68
Default Re: Re-learning how to laydown top pair... standard?

if the guy is 50/10/1.5 then its an easy calldown.

if he is 50/5/.5 then its a pretty good fold.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-01-2005, 09:57 AM
Wynton Wynton is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 18
Default Re: Re-learning how to laydown top pair... standard?

Isn't it considerably more likely villain has A4 or A2 (rather than trips), meaning you have 6 clean outs to win (Qs and 5s), and perhaps another 4 to split (gutshot)?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.