#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Moving up from NL10/20 to 25/50 and/or 50/100
Currently 4-tabling Party should have much lower variance and higher EV. The primary advantages to "moving up" are (1) it's fun; (2) you'll get better faster and (3) you'll get more responses to your posts here.
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Moving up from NL10/20 to 25/50 and/or 50/100
Nice to see someone post their stats. Seems to me 16 big blinds/100 hands is a bit high for 10-handed high-stakes games. If we took every poster with 50K+ hands would we see many? But I rarely play longhanded poker as shorter-handed is so much more fun for me.
True hourly rates would be fun to know. At 300+ hands/hour it gets interesting. If we knew the climate would continue it would be hard for any good player to justify keeping the day job. I vote from here on out all winrates should be posted as dollars/hand or big blinds/hand. That's something you can chew. Matt |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Moving up from NL10/20 to 25/50 and/or 50/100
[ QUOTE ]
I vote from here on out all winrates should be posted as dollars/hand or big blinds/hand. [/ QUOTE ] agreed. |
|
|