Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 10-19-2005, 10:59 AM
Matt Flynn Matt Flynn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 301
Default Re: Moving up from NL10/20 to 25/50 and/or 50/100

Currently 4-tabling Party should have much lower variance and higher EV. The primary advantages to "moving up" are (1) it's fun; (2) you'll get better faster and (3) you'll get more responses to your posts here.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-19-2005, 11:07 AM
Matt Flynn Matt Flynn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 301
Default Re: Moving up from NL10/20 to 25/50 and/or 50/100

Nice to see someone post their stats. Seems to me 16 big blinds/100 hands is a bit high for 10-handed high-stakes games. If we took every poster with 50K+ hands would we see many? But I rarely play longhanded poker as shorter-handed is so much more fun for me.

True hourly rates would be fun to know. At 300+ hands/hour it gets interesting. If we knew the climate would continue it would be hard for any good player to justify keeping the day job.

I vote from here on out all winrates should be posted as dollars/hand or big blinds/hand. That's something you can chew.

Matt
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-19-2005, 11:09 AM
AZK AZK is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 48
Default Re: Moving up from NL10/20 to 25/50 and/or 50/100

[ QUOTE ]
I vote from here on out all winrates should be posted as dollars/hand or big blinds/hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

agreed.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.