Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > Multi-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-30-2005, 12:38 PM
illegit illegit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 217
Default Re: Question about MTT ROI versus 1 table ROI (Mark Blade)

If you have a significant sample size of SNGs played and MTTs played I think you'd see that this is unquestionably true.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-30-2005, 03:14 PM
Chipp Leider Chipp Leider is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 22
Default Re: Question about MTT ROI versus 1 table ROI (Mark Blade)

Do you guys actually believe that "many" pros are pulling in 5*buy-in?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-30-2005, 03:38 PM
burningyen burningyen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 175
Default Re: Question about MTT ROI versus 1 table ROI (Mark Blade)

[ QUOTE ]
Do you guys actually believe that "many" pros are pulling in 5*buy-in?

[/ QUOTE ]
Not in the long run. But I also suspect that no one has played enough MTTs at any given level to have a significant sample size.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-30-2005, 03:59 PM
A_PLUS A_PLUS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 44
Default Re: Question about MTT ROI versus 1 table ROI (Mark Blade)

ROI which is another way of saying "What % of my tournament entry to I expect to win over time"

ROI from a MTT would need to be at least 5-6 x as large as ROI for a SNG to make the two equal, they make at least 5-6 times as long. ROI measures how well you are doing at a particular type of tournament. But if you want to compare across types, you need to look at $/hr. I would play a game with .01% ROI, if it could be played once per second.

2nd, you have to see why ROI would be higher for the best MTT player vs the best STT player (even if they took the same amount of time). A STT player would need to win 100% of the time, to have a 500% ROI, a MTT player could, in theory achieve a few hundred times that.

If you want to compare the two forms, make sure you use stats that actually compare them
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-30-2005, 08:36 PM
nath nath is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 79
Default Re: Question about MTT ROI versus 1 table ROI (Mark Blade)

Here's a question: how many tournaments played is considered a staistically significant sample size?
Since I became a winning player, I've been pulling a great ROI (I don't have stats before then), but I still don't know how much of it is just being on the good side of variance. (I'm getting close to 200 MTTs if my numbers are correct.)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-30-2005, 09:00 PM
JeanieJ JeanieJ is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 13
Default Re: Question about MTT ROI versus 1 table ROI (Mark Blade)

From what I've heard it's 200 MTT's per level that you play. Which is quite a lot of tournaments if you play a wide variety of MTT's.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-31-2005, 12:43 AM
nath nath is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 79
Default Re: Question about MTT ROI versus 1 table ROI (Mark Blade)

Yeah... my direct buyins range from $11s to $215s (though not often). Plus a smattering of rebuys, usually $11rs but occasionally the $3rs and $5rs (and in one unfortunate incident last night, a $33r).

I just worry I'm headed for a hard crash (and I've been witnessing the cruel side of variance all week). What kind of ROI can a good player expect in MTTs, anyway?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.