|
|
#1
10-18-2005, 08:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
A standard bluff induce hand(?)
The preflop play isn't standard, but this guy was a real weak limper and limped with trash and suited connectors or one-gappers a lot.
6-handed He has 150 on the CO and I have him covered in the SB. He limps, I raise to 10$ with K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], he calls. 22$ FLOP 10[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] I bet 15$ and he calls 52$ TURN 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] I bet 35$ he calls 122$ RIVER 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] I check intending to call an all in which would be 90$ 
|
|
#3
10-18-2005, 08:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A standard bluff induce hand(?)
Isolating out of position with an unplayable hand sucks. Inducing a bluff from a guy that called down on a DRAWLESS board sucks. There is nothing in your post to suggest that this is a good play against this player.
|
|
#5
10-18-2005, 08:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A standard bluff induce hand(?)
Drawless? 79, J9, and QJ seem to be in his handrange as well as a lot of other draw hands that picked up the heart flush draw on the turn - Q9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] etc. I should also have mentioned that this guy was passive so where a lot of players might have pushed the turn with a big draw, he might not
He is a very loose limper and I think I agree that the preflop play is pretty horrible, but I was just thinking along the lines of "I'm wagering 10 to win 5 and I think I'll do that more than 1 in 3 times so its profitable" - that was probably overestimation on my part
|
|
#6
10-18-2005, 08:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A standard bluff induce hand(?)
[ QUOTE ]
I was just thinking along the lines of "I'm wagering 10 to win 5 and I think I'll do that more than 1 in 3 times so its profitable" [/ QUOTE ] Where did you learn math?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
