#1
|
|||
|
|||
Low limit beatable? or impossible! (short non-bump)
In the future posts like that need a single reply that says simply, "Yes." That's it.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Low limit beatable? or impossible! (short non-bump)
[ QUOTE ]
In the future posts like that need a single reply that says simply, "Yes." That's it. [/ QUOTE ] So I guess you are filling in for bisonbison in his absence. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Low limit beatable? or impossible! (short non-bump)
k
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Low limit beatable? or impossible! (short non-bump)
Yes.
You are an effing moron who obviously can't play. I have been beating 0.50-1.00 for 82.8 bb/100 over the last 400,000 hands and if you can't beat the game it just means you suck. Or you don't have a pattern mapper. -Michael |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Low limit beatable? or impossible! (short non-bump)
[ QUOTE ]
Yes. You are an effing moron who obviously can't play. I have been beating 0.50-1.00 for 82.8 bb/100 over the last 400,000 hands and if you can't beat the game it just means you suck. Or you don't have a pattern mapper. -Michael [/ QUOTE ] That is unsutainable in the long run. Come back when you have 4,000,000 hands. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Low limit beatable? or impossible! (short non-bump)
I recommend the same thing for the online poker is rigged threads.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Low limit beatable? or impossible! (short non-bump)
Lighten up, Francis. Mike was using what we call "sarcasm."
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Low limit beatable? or impossible! (short non-bump)
I've got 10,000,000 hands logged on PS .05/.10 and so far my winrate is only 99.356BB/100 and std/100 is 0.0835BB/100.... I know its not the long run but I'm getting close
I know the $/hr isn't great but I normally play at 10 tables at a time. So I make it up in volume!!!! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Low limit beatable? or impossible! (short non-bump)
I've found one low limit game I don't think was beatable: $1-3 spread stud with no ante and a $4 rake. That game no longer is spread at Foxwoods -- now it has a .50 rake and is very, very beatable.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Low limit beatable? or impossible! (short non-bump)
[ QUOTE ]
I've found one low limit game I don't think was beatable: $1-3 spread stud with no ante and a $4 rake. That game no longer is spread at Foxwoods -- now it has a .50 rake and is very, very beatable. [/ QUOTE ] Did you say a .50 rake?! That's insane. How can they possibly afford to spread that game? I've played the 1-3 and 1-5 stud games at fw and they get out approximately four hands per hour. |
|
|