|
|
#21
06-09-2005, 03:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Support is Hilarious
[ QUOTE ]
I call BS on this reply email. No way would they have given you this detailed of a response. Usually the response has nothing to do with the question even. [/ QUOTE ] 
|
|
#22
06-09-2005, 03:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Support is Hilarious
I'll be happy to forward the e-mail to anyone that is calling BS. PM me your email address.
Edit: The reply came from alerts and not support. Generally alerts people at least have an IQ..they deal with fraud and what not.
|
|
#23
06-09-2005, 03:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Support is Hilarious
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Thank you for contacting us. Please note that it is not possible to go back into time [/ QUOTE ] hysterical [/ QUOTE ] It is quite funny that they are ignorant to time travel. [/ QUOTE ] LMAO
|
|
#24
06-09-2005, 03:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Support is Hilarious
[ QUOTE ]
It is quite funny that they are ignorant to time travel. [/ QUOTE ] What region DVDs do they play in whatever country they're in, as they obviously need to be sent a copy of Donnie Darko... Barron Vangor Toth www.BarronVangorToth.com
|
|
#27
06-09-2005, 05:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Support is Hilarious
lmfao - at least I understand now. When my colleague mentioned this email to me (yes we were mocking you [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]), my exact comments were:
"There are alot of more profitable uses of a time machine than to win a hand of poker..." Regards, Ellis
|
|
#28
06-09-2005, 05:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Support is Hilarious
It wouldn't work anyhow. You couldn't be dealt into the hand because you would now be at the table along with others which would change the time ever so slightly. Of course if you saw yourself at the table winning the hand, then you'd be ok. But you couldn't change it anyhow since it already happened.
Now with sports betting, I think you have an angle!
|
|
#29
06-09-2005, 05:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Support is Hilarious
[ QUOTE ]
My understanding was that Party's "deck" was constantly being shuffled inbetween cards. This answer from support suggests that the shuffling ends when the first cards are dealt. Anybody know which is right? --Zetack [/ QUOTE ] not trying to cast aspersions as to the validity of the op's email, but you are correct on this fact. as has been reported by party many times, the "next" cards are "realtime" generated. they use a number of factors for the randomization such as "thermal noise," which includes mouse activity, among other things, to ensure that the ensuing cards cannot be known ahead of time, because they aren't even generated until needed. this prevents a plantepoker type of hack from ever being possible.
|
|
#30
06-09-2005, 07:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Support is Hilarious
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] My understanding was that Party's "deck" was constantly being shuffled inbetween cards. This answer from support suggests that the shuffling ends when the first cards are dealt. Anybody know which is right? --Zetack [/ QUOTE ] not trying to cast aspersions as to the validity of the op's email, but you are correct on this fact. as has been reported by party many times, the "next" cards are "realtime" generated. they use a number of factors for the randomization such as "thermal noise," which includes mouse activity, among other things, to ensure that the ensuing cards cannot be known ahead of time, because they aren't even generated until needed. this prevents a plantepoker type of hack from ever being possible. [/ QUOTE ] Link? Thousands of people have brought this up but no one has ever proved it. Do you have evidence that Party uses a deck that is shuffled until the last player acts in a round?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
