Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-17-2005, 05:27 PM
MelchyBeau MelchyBeau is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ruston, La... Soon San Diego
Posts: 186
Default Wikipedia is as accurate as Britannica.

[ QUOTE ]
Wikipedia, the encyclopedia that relies on volunteers to pen nearly 4m articles, is almost as accurate on scientific topics as the Encyclopedia Britannica, the journal Nature said.

The journal compared articles covering a range of sciences just as Wikipedia is under fire over over the accuracy of entries, including a long-running one falsely claiming a prominent journalist was a suspect in the Kennedy assassinations.

Such errors appear to be the exception rather than the rule, Nature said. The average scientific entry in Wikipedia had four errors or omissions, Britannica had three.

[/ QUOTE ]

LINK

Melch
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-17-2005, 05:54 PM
man man is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 26
Default Re: Wikipedia is as accurate as Britannica.

this totally makes my day after basing half of a recent paper on wikipedia articles.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-17-2005, 06:23 PM
David04 David04 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 175
Default Re: Wikipedia is as accurate as Britannica.

Yesterday my English teacher told us that Wikipedia was not a credible source, and we couldn't use it for papers. I'm going to show this to her on monday.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-17-2005, 06:27 PM
KneeCo KneeCo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 77
Default Re: Wikipedia is as accurate as Britannica.

From Penny Arcade:
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-17-2005, 07:55 PM
Pudge714 Pudge714 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 58
Default Re: Wikipedia is as accurate as Britannica.

They are pretty good about editing the edits though. On several occasions I have tried adding the Coconut Banger's Ball: It's A Rap! to Robert Goulet discography, however they keep on changing it.
As well funny story about the edits
We edited the entry on the Alexander Technique (Some Acting Technique, it's irrelevant what it is for the story) To say that Rob Schneider was the greatest Alexander Technique actor. Then a kid who had to do a presentation about it said that Rob Schneider was teh greatest Alexander Technique actor. The teached gave him a look as if he just whipped it out, and the rest of the class burst out laughing.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-17-2005, 07:56 PM
Warik Warik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 436
Default Re: Wikipedia is as accurate as Britannica.

[ QUOTE ]
Yesterday my English teacher told us that Wikipedia was not a credible source, and we couldn't use it for papers. I'm going to show this to her on monday.

[/ QUOTE ]

She'll just claim that the source that says that Wikipedia is a credible source is not a credible source. My professors always gave me the same crap about sources. Just write the paper first and look for sources later...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-17-2005, 07:57 PM
InchoateHand InchoateHand is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Awake, goddamnit, awake.
Posts: 636
Default Re: Wikipedia is as accurate as Britannica.

Presumedly professors are hoping you use sources beyond Enclycopedias, online or otherwise? Don't you [censored] kids know how to read monographs anymore?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-17-2005, 08:06 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Wikipedia is as accurate as Britannica.

[ QUOTE ]
Presumedly professors are hoping you use sources beyong Enclycopedia, online or otherwise? Don't you [censored] kids know how to read monographs anymore?

[/ QUOTE ]

It's a question of caring

But yeah, Wikipedia is awesome. I recently looked up Scientology after watching the South Park Episode about it it.....

man, I knew they were a little off but I had no idea untill I read that...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-17-2005, 08:27 PM
gamblore99 gamblore99 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 271
Default Re: Wikipedia is as accurate as Britannica.

[ QUOTE ]
Presumedly professors are hoping you use sources beyond Enclycopedias, online or otherwise? Don't you [censored] kids know how to read monographs anymore?

[/ QUOTE ]
I am just going to assume monograph is some sort of primary source. All my courses this year (3rd and 2nd year) now use journal articles as our main source. Its really cool to look at the primary sources for textbooks and encyclopedias, and it also makes it clear that a lot of "facts" in psychology and biology rest on shaky ground. The understanding in experimental methods alone makes journal articals really good to use.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-17-2005, 08:32 PM
maryfield48 maryfield48 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
Posts: 144
Default Re: Wikipedia is as accurate as Britannica.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The average scientific entry in Wikipedia had four errors or omissions, Britannica had three.

[/ QUOTE ]

LINK

Melch

[/ QUOTE ]

So they have 33% more errors, on average. That's what you call "as accurate" as Britannica?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.