Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 01-12-2005, 12:21 AM
WarDekar WarDekar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 127
Default Re: 4: Bending over not advised

TP, are you in school?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-12-2005, 12:22 AM
eastbay eastbay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 647
Default Re: 200 from 200 then 200 at 200

[ QUOTE ]
I'm going to write down 200 lessons I learn from watching $200 SNGs. Then I'm going to play 200 of them. I am currently playing the $30's.

[/ QUOTE ]

Jumping from $33 to $215 would be a terrible mistake. Are you really planning on that?

eastbay
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-12-2005, 12:49 AM
adanthar adanthar is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 27
Default Re: 4: Bending over not advised

[ QUOTE ]
Level 2, ten players, stacks all ~T1000.
UTG raises to 90.
MP calls. Rest of the table folds.

Flop: T T 6

UTG bets half the pot, MP min raises, UTG calls.


[/ QUOTE ]

I post this same exact freaking hand in this forum (with reversed position and a low buyin, but close enough) and half of you are saying to fold AA.

THIS is why that's, like, the worst fold ever.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-12-2005, 01:12 AM
Texas Pete Texas Pete is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 82
Default Two answers in one

I'm in the school of the $200 SNG! I'm getting ready to pay my 30 buy-ins of (un-scared) tuition money.

Eastbay: since I think I understand at least some of what is going on and what the players are trying to do, it's not a mistake. On the other hand, I might not understand what is really going on. That's why i'm posting instead of scribbling in a notebook.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-12-2005, 01:14 AM
WarDekar WarDekar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 127
Default Re: Two answers in one

So are you in school? I ask cause I know someone with the nickname Texas Pete.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-12-2005, 01:14 AM
eastbay eastbay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 647
Default Re: Two answers in one

[ QUOTE ]
I'm in the school of the $200 SNG! I'm getting ready to pay my 30 buy-ins of (un-scared) tuition money.

Eastbay: since I think I understand at least some of what is going on and what the players are trying to do, it's not a mistake. On the other hand, I might not understand what is really going on. That's why i'm posting instead of scribbling in a notebook.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't pay to learn, I charge. That seems like a better deal to me.

eastbay
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-12-2005, 01:16 AM
Texas Pete Texas Pete is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: 4: Bending over not advised

I agree, at this level AT, KT, etc, are not going to cold-call an UTG raise on level 2. Hell, I don't even do that at the 30's.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-16-2005, 04:38 PM
Texas Pete Texas Pete is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 82
Default 5: Not betting enough

Level 1, 10 players, stacks haven't changed much.
UTG+1 limps, followed by MP, and the blinds.

Pot T60
Flop K [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 3 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 7 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

Blinds check
UTG+1 Bets 45
MP Raises to 90
Table folds to UTG+1 who calls

Pot T 240
Turn brings 3 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

UTG+1 checks
MP bets 70
UTG+1 calls

Pot T380
River J [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
UTG+1 bets 150
MP calls

UTG Turns over A [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]5 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
MP Wins with K [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Q [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

I think UTG+1 played this horribly, like there was
no real plan behind his bets.
First I would try to build the pot on the flop. I
would min bet or check here, to keep people in.

Second, if he's going to bluff at this pot, the turn
was the time to do it, when the board paired. That would
give MP something else to worry about besides the flush
draw. I think a big bet here would have folded MP. However, the question is, do you really want to play that way this early?

Then again on the river, UTG+1 must realize that bet will not fold MP, and UTG+1 has nothing to showdown with. A proper bluff at the pot requires a huge bet here.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-17-2005, 03:25 PM
Texas Pete Texas Pete is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 82
Default 6: Early Aggression

First hand of Level 2, 10 Players, all stacks ~T1000.

UTG comes in with 175.
UTG+2 re-raises all-in.
Table folds to UTG who calls.

UTG had 99
UTG+2 had AQos
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-17-2005, 04:09 PM
citanul citanul is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 64
Default Re: 6: Early Aggression

Hey Pete,

First off, lemme say that at the rate you are going, if you just move up limits when your br allows, you'll probably be up to the 200s by the time you hit "lesson" 200. So all those hatas that said not to do anything crazy for br reasons, can stfu.

Second, I've been "following" your "lessons" for a while now, and really have been struck by some "what the [censored] is he thinking?" moments. What is lesson 6 here supposed to be? This hand you're quoting is abolutely not the norm at all for the $215s. Not the original raise, not the reraise, and not the call.

Perhaps along with your little trite cropped up hands, you could post what you're thinking more than "early aggression." Then maybe your posts would be helpful or something. Or perhaps people could help you. You never know.

Good luck and all, but at the moment, this stuff seems mightilly retarded.

citanul
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.