#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why Party opposes rakeback....thanks BusterStacks!
If Party was to openly endorse rakeback, then they would have to assume a certain amount of responsiblitly for rogue affiliates. They would have to investigate accusations, close affiliate accounts, provide players with new affiliates for rakeback....
and this point is dumb how? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why Party opposes rakeback....thanks BusterStacks!
[ QUOTE ]
ok, and I realize you and Buster hate each other. Do me a favor and don't bring me into the middle of it all. [/ QUOTE ] You brought yourself into it [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] BTW,the OP pretty much sums up why Party doesnt want any sort of rakeback. They don't want thier name assoctaied with deals made between people who have nothing to lose by being dishonest. Its bad enoughn they have to deal with people claiming their software is rigged, the guy next to him is cheating, and bots are everywhere. Last thing they want to deal with is affiliates who go rougue. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why Party opposes rakeback....thanks BusterStacks!
because the whole point of being an affiliate is making money. Being a "rogue" affiliate does nothing but cause problems for everyone.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why Party opposes rakeback....thanks BusterStacks!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] ok, and I realize you and Buster hate each other. Do me a favor and don't bring me into the middle of it all. [/ QUOTE ] You brought yourself into it [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] BTW,the OP pretty much sums up why Party doesnt want any sort of rakeback. They don't want thier name assoctaied with deals made between people who have nothing to lose by being dishonest. Its bad enoughn they have to deal with people claiming their software is rigged, the guy next to him is cheating, and bots are everywhere. Last thing they want to deal with is affiliates who go rougue. [/ QUOTE ]good God, why is anyone playing poker online? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why Party opposes rakeback....thanks BusterStacks!
This response and NLSoldiers are both incredibly rude. I can only assume that you both think that a very high post count gives you the right to degrade whomever you feel like.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why Party opposes rakeback....thanks BusterStacks!
[ QUOTE ]
Then I read BusterStacks post. I realized how poorly one promise breaking rouge affiliate can reflect on Party itself. [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] if Party openly endorsed rakeback through their affiliates, and then one of them goes rouge, [/ QUOTE ] Um...so Party has a thing against make-up wearing affiliates? I'm going to have to check with my fiance on this one. --Zetack |
|
|