Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Rake Back
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-18-2005, 01:07 AM
Sintax Sintax is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 70
Default Re: Why Party opposes rakeback....thanks BusterStacks!

If Party was to openly endorse rakeback, then they would have to assume a certain amount of responsiblitly for rogue affiliates. They would have to investigate accusations, close affiliate accounts, provide players with new affiliates for rakeback....

and this point is dumb how?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-18-2005, 01:10 AM
sublime sublime is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 681
Default Re: Why Party opposes rakeback....thanks BusterStacks!

[ QUOTE ]
ok, and I realize you and Buster hate each other. Do me a favor and don't bring me into the middle of it all.

[/ QUOTE ]

You brought yourself into it [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

BTW,the OP pretty much sums up why Party doesnt want any sort of rakeback. They don't want thier name assoctaied with deals made between people who have nothing to lose by being dishonest. Its bad enoughn they have to deal with people claiming their software is rigged, the guy next to him is cheating, and bots are everywhere. Last thing they want to deal with is affiliates who go rougue.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-18-2005, 01:11 AM
ThaSaltCracka ThaSaltCracka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 983
Default Re: Why Party opposes rakeback....thanks BusterStacks!

because the whole point of being an affiliate is making money. Being a "rogue" affiliate does nothing but cause problems for everyone.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-18-2005, 01:15 AM
ThaSaltCracka ThaSaltCracka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 983
Default Re: Why Party opposes rakeback....thanks BusterStacks!

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
ok, and I realize you and Buster hate each other. Do me a favor and don't bring me into the middle of it all.

[/ QUOTE ]

You brought yourself into it [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

BTW,the OP pretty much sums up why Party doesnt want any sort of rakeback. They don't want thier name assoctaied with deals made between people who have nothing to lose by being dishonest. Its bad enoughn they have to deal with people claiming their software is rigged, the guy next to him is cheating, and bots are everywhere. Last thing they want to deal with is affiliates who go rougue.

[/ QUOTE ]good God, why is anyone playing poker online? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-18-2005, 05:56 AM
somapopper somapopper is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 97
Default Re: Why Party opposes rakeback....thanks BusterStacks!

This response and NLSoldiers are both incredibly rude. I can only assume that you both think that a very high post count gives you the right to degrade whomever you feel like.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-18-2005, 10:35 AM
Zetack Zetack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 656
Default Re: Why Party opposes rakeback....thanks BusterStacks!

[ QUOTE ]

Then I read BusterStacks post. I realized how poorly one promise breaking rouge affiliate can reflect on Party itself.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
if Party openly endorsed rakeback through their affiliates, and then one of them goes rouge,

[/ QUOTE ]

Um...so Party has a thing against make-up wearing affiliates? I'm going to have to check with my fiance on this one.


--Zetack
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.