100 dollar bankroll.... - Page 4

Reef · #31 07-19-2005, 02:32 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
My intial deposit was 100 as well, I got lucky and didn't run into a bad streak. Now I play NL100/200.

[/ QUOTE ]
Funny. My intial deposit was 50 and I got lucky.

[/ QUOTE ]

josh3336 · #32 07-19-2005, 02:49 AM

yea i thought about the whole bonus route, but it seems like more of a hassle considering I would have to play at higher blinds to clear the bonuses, which would surely put my bankroll in jeopardy.

JaBlue · #33 07-19-2005, 02:53 AM

GO FOR IT!

fimbulwinter · #34 07-19-2005, 04:28 AM

[ QUOTE ]
I would have to play at higher blinds to clear the bonuses, which would surely put my bankroll in jeopardy.

[/ QUOTE ]
what? 25nl is fine for 100 and bonuswhoring.

fim

punter11235 · #35 07-19-2005, 05:39 AM

Hello,

First, be sure you can actually beat that game. If you played some poker before and you beat game similair to this you can give it a shot. But if you didnt dont do it, any poker game looks very soft for beginners ("wow, this Mahatma guy went all in with 3rd pair, this is nuts...").
Second, dont buyin for 25$, start with 12$ or sth similair, when you build to 150$ go to 15$ etc. Leave the table when you double up. Its not true that you have any kind of disadvantage when buy in short. Actually you have nice advantage vs your opposition BUT you play smaller stakes than they (which is good with 100$ bankroll).

Best wishes !

Niwa · #36 07-19-2005, 06:15 AM

Buy-in for $10 and go from there.

Cased Heel · #37 07-19-2005, 01:45 PM

Give it a whirl.

I started with $180 on there and skyrocketted to $580 in very few hands. (Many of these hands played on 50 NL and some on 100 NL).

Party 25 is super soft. I tend to over-value pocket pairs at this level because setting up will pay you immenseley versus 2 pairs. It's like these fools don't know what a set is.