Here's a good one for ya...PokerStars Special

[KC50]

There have been a handful or so of you that I think really understand what I'm trying to convey here. However, the majority of the forum I feel has misunderstood the context of this thread.

Let me get a couple of things straight, please.

First of all I DO NOT THINK POKERSTARS CHEATS.

Nor am I complaining of this bad beat or any of them "with respect" of being sucked out on or anything to do with my opponents play. I was thrilled when I saw him overcall with KQs to a flop of Qxx (rainbow) with my other opponent already calling all-in with AQ. We all know that their mistakes are what we capitalize on long term.

I just think it happens far more than it should at this particular site, that's all. My opinion is based on my own experiences and those fellow players that I know also play there and multiple sites.

Kind Regards,

KC

[Losing all]

I was just giving you the buisness dude. Post a bad beat or worse, a conspiracy theory in this room you'll get some of that. Now you say that wasn't your point, your point was "I just think it happens far more than it should at this particular site" I really can't see the difference.

anyways, you're not a bad guy. It might be easier for everyone involved to let it go and move on. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[Thythe]

KC, you can't say "I don't think Pokerstars are cheats" and then say suckouts happen more often than they should. If suckouts don't happen according to their expected value and somehow Pokerstars is changing that, then that means they are cheats. Perhaps that's why no one understands you...

[OldLearner]

I'm confused about the rigging.

Are they rigging it so AA loses?

I thought they only rigged it so the weaker players win more.

Obviously they must KNOW who the weak players are. AA ALWAYS wins for weak players.

The fact that YOU lost with AA must mean you are not a weak player.

Reading your original post, I immediately assumed you were a weak player (conspiracy theorists usually are).

Given this evidence, however, it is clear that you are not.

[KC50]

AA was just used as the most current exmple, not to be isolated. Please see my thread above "OK here's the deal".

KC

[MrGrob]

AA is one pair. If you have 7 cards, how often in 7 Card Stud are you happy to only have a pair of anything? AA is a great starting hand. It is even better in Hold'em. But it is still only a single pair. I has no more potential then that really, save for a set. Sure it will win most of the time...but, without catching something else, it is still only a single pair.

Sure we want to win with AA, but I DON'T want everyone to fold to my AA every time I hold it. I want people to chase...but that casing also means that at times, I will be caught...better that then to never win more then the blinds....

[KC50]

I understand all that stuff. Seems you as others have misconstrued the context of the message. Please see "OK here's the deal".

Thanks,

KC

[daryn]

the "OK here's the deal" post only magnifies your stupidity.

[KC50]

What I've noticed most about your participation here at 2+2 is that it's been of the most insignificant nature.

Have another beer kid. AA will always be there for you.

Kind Regards,

KC

[daryn]

here's one for you!


*clink*


to all the morons out there (you), may they never grow a brain and start taking away from my earnings