Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-18-2005, 02:13 PM
James Boston James Boston is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 314
Default California School Requiring Ebonics

link

[ QUOTE ]
"Ebonics is a different language, it's not slang as many believe,' Texeira said. "For many of these students Ebonics is their language, and it should be considered a foreign language. These students should be taught like other students who speak a foreign language.'

[/ QUOTE ]

Seriously...why is an educational system furthering the misuse of the English language? Isn't it enough of a problem that so many people living in America already only speak a foreign language? Do we really need to create a new one to add to the problem? I know America does not have an official language, but why are so many trying their best to encourage others not to learn proper English when they know that it will be beneficial to them?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-18-2005, 02:20 PM
asofel asofel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: brilliant in my opinion
Posts: 555
Default Re: California School Requiring Ebonics

[ QUOTE ]
link

[ QUOTE ]
"Ebonics is a different language, it's not slang as many believe,' Texeira said. "For many of these students Ebonics is their language, and it should be considered a foreign language. These students should be taught like other students who speak a foreign language.'

[/ QUOTE ]

Seriously...why is an educational system furthering the misuse of the English language? Isn't it enough of a problem that so many people living in America already only speak a foreign language? Do we really need to create a new one to add to the problem? I know America does not have an official language, but why are so many trying their best to encourage others not to learn proper English when they know that it will be beneficial to them?

[/ QUOTE ]

Mang, why you gotta be hatin like that? Jus like da man to come down rough on some peeps jus straight livin, tryin a make a dolla outta fiteen cent. Lemme axe you sumpin muthafucka, how'd u feel wif dis glock ticklin yo tonsils. sheeeit...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-18-2005, 02:21 PM
B Dids B Dids is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sea-town!!
Posts: 326
Default Re: California School Requiring Ebonics

Ebonics is a name that white people made up to describe someting that linguistics already call AAVE.

The post above mine sucks.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-18-2005, 02:22 PM
asofel asofel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: brilliant in my opinion
Posts: 555
Default Re: California School Requiring Ebonics

[ QUOTE ]
Ebonics is a name that white people made up to describe someting that linguistics already call AAVE.

The post above mine sucks.

[/ QUOTE ]

i thought i'd get the obvious reply over and done with. sorry for the lack of amusement. i couldn't help myself.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-18-2005, 02:27 PM
[censored] [censored] is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,940
Default Re: California School Requiring Ebonics

pig latin has more of a claim to being a language than ebonics.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-18-2005, 02:29 PM
Voltron87 Voltron87 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: checkraising young children
Posts: 1,326
Default Re: California School Requiring Ebonics

what i really hate is when white people are conversing with black people (this is mostly 16-25 white males to their black counterparts) and try to "talk black". this pisses me off to no end.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-18-2005, 02:29 PM
ChoicestHops ChoicestHops is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 341
Default Re: California School Requiring Ebonics

This is ridiculously stupid.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-18-2005, 02:30 PM
bisonbison bisonbison is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I will poop in your pillowcase.
Posts: 1,389
Default Re: California School Requiring Ebonics

Dibs is right. All ebonics or AAVE or BVE is is a low-prestige dialect of English. If it helps the kids learn the Broadcast Standard English that will help them get jobs later in life, I can't imagine why this would be problematic.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-18-2005, 02:40 PM
PokerBob PokerBob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: St. Paul
Posts: 238
Default Re: California School Requiring Ebonics

[ QUOTE ]
link

[ QUOTE ]
"Ebonics is a different language, it's not slang as many believe,' Texeira said. "For many of these students Ebonics is their language, and it should be considered a foreign language. These students should be taught like other students who speak a foreign language.'

[/ QUOTE ]

Seriously...why is an educational system furthering the misuse of the English language? Isn't it enough of a problem that so many people living in America already only speak a foreign language? Do we really need to create a new one to add to the problem? I know America does not have an official language, but why are so many trying their best to encourage others not to learn proper English when they know that it will be beneficial to them?

[/ QUOTE ]

My friend summed it up best 8 years ago when this first turned up in Oakland, "I've had bad grammar all my life, but I don't get to call it a language." That said, what Bison said has merit, but I think this could be a slippery slope.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-18-2005, 02:42 PM
James Boston James Boston is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 314
Default Re: California School Requiring Ebonics

[ QUOTE ]
If it helps the kids learn the Broadcast Standard English that will help them get jobs later in life, I can't imagine why this would be problematic.

[/ QUOTE ]

I disagree. If AAVE is a deviation of "the broadcast standard English," then it would stand to reason that you would already have a grasp of the fundamentals of speech if you were using a colloquial version of it. Don't teach someone how do something that is 80% wrong so that the 20% that is right will be retained. If someone were using the word "ain't," then they would seem to have a good concept of when and where to use "am not." Why settle for the fact that they get the general idea when you could show them how to speak properly?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.