|
|
#61
10-23-2005, 03:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I knew party poker blackjack would be the end of me...
[ QUOTE ]
Of course I do. Don't you? [/ QUOTE ] FISH! [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] 
|
|
#62
10-23-2005, 09:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I knew party poker blackjack would be the end of me...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] You're friend is the smartest retard EVER! [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#63
10-23-2005, 10:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I knew party poker blackjack would be the end of me...
here's a 2p2 thread that might help you remove BJ from your PP screen. this just addresses a symptom if indeed you have a problem but it will certainly help if BJ is just this insidious, alluring ring of power that you can't help putting on your finger.
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...mp;sb=5&o=
|
|
#64
10-23-2005, 10:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I knew party poker blackjack would be the end of me...
Party's blackjack is probably bad for the 2+2 player, considering that most people who are going to be playing blackjack are going to be the fish we get our money from. I'm sure thousands and thousands of fish will go prematurely broke from blackjack before they can give us their money, and this will take a serious toll on the average 2+2er's profitability.
Opinions?
|
|
#65
10-24-2005, 08:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I knew party poker blackjack would be the end of me...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Also, don't you know that in Internet blackjack it's a single deck with a shuffle between each hand? Thus, with optimal play it's still a -EV game even more than in a casino because you can't count cards. Simply put David Sklansky would have a hard time, if he even could, beating Internet blackjack. [/ QUOTE ] None of this is true. GoT [/ QUOTE ] Yea cause if you remember, Skalansky is god. blake
|
|
#66
10-24-2005, 08:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I knew party poker blackjack would be the end of me...
anybody who saw me play at vegas last time knows how great i am at blackjack.
what can i say? gambling is fun.. and it can remain fun as long as you maintain some type of self control... it looks like you lost this self control and learned this lesson the hardway. just learn from your mistakes.. for some people some lessons are more expensive then others.
|
|
#68
10-24-2005, 11:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I knew party poker blackjack would be the end of me...
[ QUOTE ]
anybody who saw me play at vegas last time knows how great i am at blackjack. what can i say? gambling is fun.. and it can remain fun as long as you maintain some type of self control... it looks like you lost this self control and learned this lesson the hardway. just learn from your mistakes.. for some people some lessons are more expensive then others. [/ QUOTE ] Best answer yet.
|
|
#69
10-24-2005, 12:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I knew party poker blackjack would be the end of me...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Also, don't you know that in Internet blackjack it's a single deck with a shuffle between each hand? Thus, with optimal play it's still a -EV game even more than in a casino because you can't count cards. Simply put David Sklansky would have a hard time, if he even could, beating Internet blackjack. [/ QUOTE ] None of this is true. GoT [/ QUOTE ] Yea cause if you remember, Skalansky is god. blake [/ QUOTE ] No, becuase Sklanky would lose. God would lose too. There is no "having a hard time" about it. EStreet almost suggested that Sklansky would have a shot at winning long term. He would not.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
