Essay Structure Question

In a philosophy paper, should the arguments go in order of strongest to weakest or weakest to strongest?

[Scotch78]

Neither is an optimal way to organize your paper. Without actually reading the paper, the best I can say is to begin with the most common or broadest argument and proceed through the sub- and counter-arguments as you critique the original.

Scott

I'll send it to you as soon as I can turn it into something worth reading - probably on Friday. Of course, that's when it's due [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[SonofJen]

Clearly define the problem, present your solution or reconciliation with the problem, acknoledge objections to your own theory/solution, address these concerns.

Don't be afraid to use the first person.
Don't worry about your writing sounding too dry (i.e. you don't need fancy introductions or transitions - just tell it like it is).
Oh, and REALLY make sure you understand the arguments before writing.

Check out Pryor on Phi Writing for a much more comprehensive explanation on what it takes to write a good philosophy paper.

Good luck!

[Scotch78]

[ QUOTE ]
I'll send it to you as soon as I can turn it into something worth reading - probably on Friday. Of course, that's when it's due

[/ QUOTE ]

This is the paper on SK, right?

Scott

Yes, comparing the concept of sickness in SK and FN.

[Scotch78]

I have some time tonight, e-mail it to Since1978ataol.com and we can work on it over IM.

Scott

I've got to stop working on it for now. I'd send you what I have but it's honestly not worth it -- still pretty unclear and fragmented. I'd rather wait till it's more complete.

[bearly]

i assume you are making your own arguments, not rehashing what other's have said; in which case there should be no weak arguments. if you are doing a 'cut and paste' job, any decent professor will be turned off at the use of the weak arguments as a foil---therefore, simply identify the weak arguments for what they are and move on.........b