Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-11-2005, 01:58 PM
hoyaboy1 hoyaboy1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cheating at WEBoggle
Posts: 246
Default Running Fantasy Football draft rating thread

I'll start [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] If you ask for a rating, make sure you comment on other peoples' drafts.

10 team league, QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, TE, DEF, K, standard scoring. I had the 1st pick.

1. (1) L. Tomlinson
2. (20) R. Johnson
3. (21) T. Holt
4. (40) K. Collins
5. (41) J. Witten
6. (60) C. Chambers
7. (61) D. Mason
8. (80) K. Barlow
9. (81) C. Benson
10. (100) L. Evans
11. (101) Buffalo
12. (120) D. Carr
13. (121) E. Kennison
14. (140) M. Faulk
15. (141) C. Rogers

I am not that happy with 4 and 5 - but the elite RBs were gone, and I thought I could get WRs of similar value later, which i think I did. Still doesn't look right. I'll try to make a trade before the season and use the space to get a kicker.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-11-2005, 02:05 PM
brettbrettr brettbrettr is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: Running Fantasy Football draft rating thread

[ QUOTE ]

1. (1) L. Tomlinson --good
2. (20) R. Johnson -good
3. (21) T. Holt -good
4. (40) K. Collins - not good
5. (41) J. Witten -eh
6. (60) C. Chambers -eh, qb troubles, but I guess its ok
7. (61) D. Mason --good
8. (80) K. Barlow --good
9. (81) C. Benson --good
10. (100) L. Evans --Go Badgers.
11. (101) Buffalo --defense sucks
12. (120) D. Carr --nice
13. (121) E. Kennison --fine
14. (140) M. Faulk --fine
15. (141) C. Rogers --good


[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-11-2005, 02:05 PM
hoyaboy1 hoyaboy1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cheating at WEBoggle
Posts: 246
Default Re: Running Fantasy Football draft rating thread

Buffalo's defense does not suck. At all.

Edit - unless you meant I picked a D too early, which is possible. But I thought Buffalo's D was a lot better than those left, and didn't think that about any other available positions.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-11-2005, 02:09 PM
wh1t3bread wh1t3bread is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Initech
Posts: 73
Default Re: Running Fantasy Football draft rating thread

Looks pretty good. I think you took Collins 1 round too early and Witten a round or 2 too early. Taking a defense (no matter how good) that early was probably a mistake.

I like your QB situation and your RB situation. Your first 3 picks were pretty good. Solid team overall I think.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-11-2005, 02:09 PM
brettbrettr brettbrettr is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: Running Fantasy Football draft rating thread

[ QUOTE ]
Buffalo's defense does not suck. At all.

[/ QUOTE ]

I meant all defenses suck. Every year I pick one up witha a good week one match-up. Then I grab another in week 2. Then I keep them all year because they're good all year. Wasting picks on D is bad tho, unless you find the Ravens available late or something...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-11-2005, 02:12 PM
SossMan SossMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 559
Default Re: Running Fantasy Football draft rating thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

1. (1) L. Tomlinson --good
2. (20) R. Johnson -good
3. (21) T. Holt -good
4. (40) K. Collins - not good
5. (41) J. Witten -eh
6. (60) C. Chambers -eh, qb troubles, but I guess its ok
7. (61) D. Mason --good
8. (80) K. Barlow --good
9. (81) C. Benson --good
10. (100) L. Evans --Go Badgers.
11. (101) Buffalo --defense sucks
12. (120) D. Carr --nice
13. (121) E. Kennison --fine
14. (140) M. Faulk --fine
15. (141) C. Rogers --good


[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-11-2005, 02:26 PM
morello morello is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3
Default Re: Running Fantasy Football draft rating thread

First three picks are good. I don't like the Kerry Collins pick that much.

Witten is a good pick IMO. Only one TD last year, I think he will grab much more this year.

The Chambers and Barlow picks are pretty "meh" to me.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-11-2005, 02:33 PM
imported_anacardo imported_anacardo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: East Texas
Posts: 721
Default Re: Running Fantasy Football draft rating thread

Witten had like 6 touchdowns last year. I took joy in them all, as a Dallas fan + former owner.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-11-2005, 02:42 PM
brettbrettr brettbrettr is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: Running Fantasy Football draft rating thread

[ QUOTE ]
Witten had like 6 touchdowns last year. I took joy in them all, as a Dallas fan + former owner.

[/ QUOTE ]

HOld on. Syntax. You're a fantasy owner of the one Jason Witten or real life owner of the Dallas Cowboys?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-11-2005, 03:30 PM
morello morello is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3
Default Re: Running Fantasy Football draft rating thread

[ QUOTE ]
Witten had like 6 touchdowns last year. I took joy in them all, as a Dallas fan + former owner.

[/ QUOTE ]

Whoops, you are correct. Clearly I don't know how to read.

But whatever, Witten is still a good pickup.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.