#1
|
|||
|
|||
Running Fantasy Football draft rating thread
I'll start [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] If you ask for a rating, make sure you comment on other peoples' drafts.
10 team league, QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, TE, DEF, K, standard scoring. I had the 1st pick. 1. (1) L. Tomlinson 2. (20) R. Johnson 3. (21) T. Holt 4. (40) K. Collins 5. (41) J. Witten 6. (60) C. Chambers 7. (61) D. Mason 8. (80) K. Barlow 9. (81) C. Benson 10. (100) L. Evans 11. (101) Buffalo 12. (120) D. Carr 13. (121) E. Kennison 14. (140) M. Faulk 15. (141) C. Rogers I am not that happy with 4 and 5 - but the elite RBs were gone, and I thought I could get WRs of similar value later, which i think I did. Still doesn't look right. I'll try to make a trade before the season and use the space to get a kicker. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Running Fantasy Football draft rating thread
[ QUOTE ]
1. (1) L. Tomlinson --good 2. (20) R. Johnson -good 3. (21) T. Holt -good 4. (40) K. Collins - not good 5. (41) J. Witten -eh 6. (60) C. Chambers -eh, qb troubles, but I guess its ok 7. (61) D. Mason --good 8. (80) K. Barlow --good 9. (81) C. Benson --good 10. (100) L. Evans --Go Badgers. 11. (101) Buffalo --defense sucks 12. (120) D. Carr --nice 13. (121) E. Kennison --fine 14. (140) M. Faulk --fine 15. (141) C. Rogers --good [/ QUOTE ] |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Running Fantasy Football draft rating thread
Buffalo's defense does not suck. At all.
Edit - unless you meant I picked a D too early, which is possible. But I thought Buffalo's D was a lot better than those left, and didn't think that about any other available positions. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Running Fantasy Football draft rating thread
Looks pretty good. I think you took Collins 1 round too early and Witten a round or 2 too early. Taking a defense (no matter how good) that early was probably a mistake.
I like your QB situation and your RB situation. Your first 3 picks were pretty good. Solid team overall I think. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Running Fantasy Football draft rating thread
[ QUOTE ]
Buffalo's defense does not suck. At all. [/ QUOTE ] I meant all defenses suck. Every year I pick one up witha a good week one match-up. Then I grab another in week 2. Then I keep them all year because they're good all year. Wasting picks on D is bad tho, unless you find the Ravens available late or something... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Running Fantasy Football draft rating thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 1. (1) L. Tomlinson --good 2. (20) R. Johnson -good 3. (21) T. Holt -good 4. (40) K. Collins - not good 5. (41) J. Witten -eh 6. (60) C. Chambers -eh, qb troubles, but I guess its ok 7. (61) D. Mason --good 8. (80) K. Barlow --good 9. (81) C. Benson --good 10. (100) L. Evans --Go Badgers. 11. (101) Buffalo --defense sucks 12. (120) D. Carr --nice 13. (121) E. Kennison --fine 14. (140) M. Faulk --fine 15. (141) C. Rogers --good [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Running Fantasy Football draft rating thread
First three picks are good. I don't like the Kerry Collins pick that much.
Witten is a good pick IMO. Only one TD last year, I think he will grab much more this year. The Chambers and Barlow picks are pretty "meh" to me. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Running Fantasy Football draft rating thread
Witten had like 6 touchdowns last year. I took joy in them all, as a Dallas fan + former owner.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Running Fantasy Football draft rating thread
[ QUOTE ]
Witten had like 6 touchdowns last year. I took joy in them all, as a Dallas fan + former owner. [/ QUOTE ] HOld on. Syntax. You're a fantasy owner of the one Jason Witten or real life owner of the Dallas Cowboys? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Running Fantasy Football draft rating thread
[ QUOTE ]
Witten had like 6 touchdowns last year. I took joy in them all, as a Dallas fan + former owner. [/ QUOTE ] Whoops, you are correct. Clearly I don't know how to read. But whatever, Witten is still a good pickup. |
|
|