Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-15-2005, 06:22 AM
imported_bezdi imported_bezdi is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 22
Default Re: Is it me or is stars 1/2 garbage?

Play Stars 6 max. They will cold call your raises with anything. I still don't understand why 6 max is so much looser on Stars compared to their regular full ring game. Maybe it is the quicker hands that make people want to play more. Or they are afraid of blinds coming around too fast.

Some guy called my pfr with Q8o, me and this other guy cap every street flop / and turn while he is still calling with a gutshot straight draw. Yes, he did make it on the river, only to split my pot with me. Top 2 pair guy lost big.

They donk bet check raise also. 3 bet them and they will fold.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-15-2005, 09:15 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Is it me or is stars 1/2 garbage?

Stars is tight right now [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-15-2005, 09:45 AM
TripleH68 TripleH68 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 390
Default Re: Is it me or is stars 1/2 garbage?

[ QUOTE ]
Trying to play profitable poker on 20-25% vpip tables is a fruitless endeavor.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is really not true. It may not be as exciting. I will give you that.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-15-2005, 09:45 AM
jrz1972 jrz1972 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 368
Default Re: Is it me or is stars 1/2 garbage?

Listen to what ClaytonN says. He is right. 6-max is very easy if you put a little effort into it, and the skill discrepency between you and the rest of the table has the potential to be much larger than it ever would be in full ring.

Everybody, and I mean literally every single person, who has ever played both full ring and shorthanded will tell you that shorthanded games are generally much softer than the corresponding full ring game at the same site. Basically, full ring games attract multitabling weak-tighties who have their copies of WLLH dog-eared and highlighted. 6-max games attract donks. You can beat the weak-tighties, but the donks are more profitable.

Yes, the full ring games at Stars suck. The 6-max games are quite soft, though, if you know what you're doing. Likewise, all I've ever heard about Absolute was that it was a rock garden, but again I've found their shorthanded games to be very easy.

Learn to play 6-max. If you don't like it, you'll find that the skills you develop make you into a better full ring player. More likely, you'll never want to go back to full ring.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-15-2005, 10:03 AM
Obliky Obliky is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not value betting the river..
Posts: 86
Default Re: Is it me or is stars 1/2 garbage?

[ QUOTE ]
Learn to play 6-max. If you don't like it, you'll find that the skills you develop make you into a better full ring player. More likely, you'll never want to go back to full ring.

[/ QUOTE ]

Amen to that...stars 6-max is treating me well at the moment, but i found the full ring games tough.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-15-2005, 10:57 AM
trainslayer trainslayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: on the edge of my seat
Posts: 123
Default Re: Is it me or is stars 1/2 garbage?

[ QUOTE ]
Listen to what ClaytonN says. He is right. 6-max is very easy if you put a little effort into it, and the skill discrepency between you and the rest of the table has the potential to be much larger than it ever would be in full ring.

Everybody, and I mean literally every single person, who has ever played both full ring and shorthanded will tell you that shorthanded games are generally much softer than the corresponding full ring game at the same site. Basically, full ring games attract multitabling weak-tighties who have their copies of WLLH dog-eared and highlighted. 6-max games attract donks. You can beat the weak-tighties, but the donks are more profitable.

Yes, the full ring games at Stars suck. The 6-max games are quite soft, though, if you know what you're doing. Likewise, all I've ever heard about Absolute was that it was a rock garden, but again I've found their shorthanded games to be very easy.

Learn to play 6-max. If you don't like it, you'll find that the skills you develop make you into a better full ring player. More likely, you'll never want to go back to full ring.

[/ QUOTE ]

Amen brother. When I read the OP my first thought was what the hell are they talkin about. I haven't seen a table less that 30-40% vpip. I just assumed everyone was playin 6max now. Just the thought of playin full makes me sick to my stomach now. Plus you don't have to get on a waiting list for 6 max (at least at stars and not usually at absolute.)
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-15-2005, 11:00 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Is it me or is stars 1/2 garbage?

[ QUOTE ]
In lieu of the partypoker happenings, I decided to take a look at other sites. With the pokerstars rake being so favorable, I figured eh let's give it a shot.

So I went on a turbo bonus-clearing spree today, and cranked out 2100+ hands on 1/2 tables on stars. The vpip on the tables was terrible. I don't recall seeing one true ridiculously bad fish. A couple of bad players sure, but nothing worth trying to make money off of. The tables are filled with tight tight players. Flops seen % almost never exceeded 30 on any table, let alone the vpip (which we all know is a few % lower). Trying to play profitable poker on 20-25% vpip tables is a fruitless endeavor.

Did I catch stars on a bad day or is it usually like this? Are the .50/1 games any better?

Not that it matters at all, but over the 2000 hands, my bb/100 is .01, and I'm up a grand total of .25 BB (50 cents). Sample size etc, but still, the tables just felt so tight I don't see how they could be profitable. And yes I tried jumping tables.

Any thoughts? Am I wrong about stars?

[/ QUOTE ]

The tables are definitely tighter than what most of us are probably used to, but it doesn't mean they are not beatable.

I played there for the first time last night (half drunk) and made a small profit just messing around.

The small NL games are a cakewalk try those out.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-15-2005, 11:38 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Is it me or is stars 1/2 garbage?

Ill drink to that! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-15-2005, 02:16 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Is it me or is stars 1/2 garbage?

Oddly enough, when I fired up Stars last night, I immediately found some loose tables and had a great session.

Problem with 6-max is the variance - I've been taking shots, and I'm in the black so far, but not without some scary freefalls. Two separate times I lost almost my whole 25BB buyin at a table, only to come back and make a profit (at one I ended up making double my buyin - a 45BB upswing). That's never happened to me in full ring.

But fish are addicted to 6-max for the action, which makes it in theory a great place to make money. (I suspect some 2+2ers play it for the action as well.)
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-15-2005, 02:59 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Is it me or is stars 1/2 garbage?

Yes the variance in 6-max is much larger, so don't worry about losing a buy-in. Many days you'll double or triple it. I went down 250 BB my first 2 days at 6-max, then back up 150 BB, then up another 50 BB yesterday. It's crazy, but it's no different from any other very high VP$IP game, and eventually the draw outs will average out.

I've been at stars 6-max clearing the bonus and have found it to be really great. Be careful about 3-betting a check-raise though. You need to do it only sparingly. The fish won't fold and won't raise with nothing usually. There are some who bluff way too much on the 6-max tables, but usually the best strategy against them is to let them keep bluffing then raise them on the end, which pulls them even further away from optimal bluffing frequency.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.