|
|
#32
10-17-2005, 03:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bizzare situation, what would the ruling be?
[ QUOTE ]
Why only non-jackpot games? [/ QUOTE ] Casinos are worried about the jackpot being stolen so they require that the shuffle procedure be followed exactly in jackpot games. Also in jackpot games the cards are always scrambled to show the camera that it isnt' a cold deck. In markets where the dealers can shuffle there is generally only a scramble on player's request in non jackpot games (some smaller markets scramble in all games). 
|
|
#33
10-17-2005, 03:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bizzare situation, what would the ruling be?
Up here they usually only scramble on request or when putting a new deck in play. And all games are JP games.
b
|
|
#34
10-17-2005, 03:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bizzare situation, what would the ruling be?
[ QUOTE ]
Up here they usually only scramble on request or when putting a new deck in play. And all games are JP games. b [/ QUOTE ] They are vulnerable to the jackpot being stolen, but that doesn't happen that often. I know of a case where a Las Vegas casino paid a jackpot on grave and then on day shift they were able to see the cold deck go in.
|
|
#35
10-17-2005, 07:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bizzare situation, what would the ruling be?
[ QUOTE ]
The art of dealing is GONE with the some of the new dealers [/ QUOTE ] That's because their floormen aren't allowed to wear steel toed boots. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] al
|
|
#36
10-17-2005, 10:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bizzare situation, what would the ruling be?
Do you remember what hand you were dealt, and how many people were dealt hands?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
