#1
|
|||
|
|||
Ten tables at a time - low limit cash - the logistics
Hi,
What's the best combination of two websites for attempting this? I believe I am capable of playing on "auto-pilot" and beating up to ten low-limit games consistently without slowing down any of the games I am in so long as they are all full 9 or 10 player tables. Clearly PokerStars should be one of the sites - but I am not sure what the other should be. I know Party allows up to 3 and the software doesn't consume much memory. Paradise and Pokerstars seem to consume a lot of memory together (or is it Paradise that is the memory hog) and Paradise allows only two tables. Does anyone have experience with a website other than Pokerstars that allows up to 5 tables, is user-friendly (to make the 10 tables possible) and isn't a memory hog so that it can co-exist with Pokerstars? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ten tables at a time - low limit cash - the logistics
Theres always the Party skins (Empire, etc) that you could play three each at. UltimateBet, with their miniview, would probably be worth checking out as well.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ten tables at a time - low limit cash - the logistics
You should definitely consider ultimatebet.com. You can
play up to 5 tables there and their software is usually very fast (except for a short time today!). There is also a wide range of limits and for NL the blinds range from one cent and two cent to $25 and $50. In addition, with their fantastic feature, miniview, you can play 5 tables and watch a bunch of other ones. I think I opened 14 windows at ub once before! No, I don't work there! But it is definitely one of the sites you should consider if you are playing ten tables. Best of luck to you! The most I have attempted is seven tables, although three of them were short-handed, but if you play at Party/Empire, sometimes the players are so slow maybe you can play twelve there! Unfortunately, I have not attempted to download other skins at that site, but I think it is possible in theory to play fifteen at that site (but I don't dare try more than twelve!). |
|
|