Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-15-2005, 01:10 PM
MonkeeMan MonkeeMan is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin
Posts: 0
Default Bubble fold or all-in?

This is actually from a 2 table sit&go. Down to last 5, top 4 get paid. Blinds are 300/600 with 50 ante. I'm the SB with 800 after posting, BB has 5K, UTG has 6K, CO has 900, Button has 14K. Everybody seems solid, the Button is the only aggressive one lately.

All fold to me and I've got AJo. Do I muck and wait for the CO to hopefully blind out and leave me with a very small stack but in the money, or do I push and try to accumulate some chips?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-15-2005, 01:18 PM
Karak567 Karak567 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16
Default Re: Bubble fold or all-in?

Personally, I would push. 4-handed in the BB I have found this to be a strong hand.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-15-2005, 01:24 PM
sofere sofere is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 118
Default Re: Bubble fold or all-in?

Ummmm....no. Your giving the cut-off 2 chances to double up. He could have a good hand UTG, or he could get lucky in the BB (And since he's calling any two in the BB, I'd say theres at least a 2:3 shot that he's gonna double).

Here your sitting with an excellent hand with one person in front of you and are very likely to have the best hand if called.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-15-2005, 04:21 PM
MonkeeMan MonkeeMan is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin
Posts: 0
Default Re: Bubble fold or all-in?

I did in fact push. But I didn't really analyze the situation, I just hastily thought "good cards, need chips, push".

What I should have done is something like:
"Hmm, lets see, hands the BB could have that have me beat right now are any PP and AK, AQ, AJs. That's 3*2 (AA,JJ) + 6*11 (other PPs) + 12 (AK) + 16 (AQ) + 2 (AJs) = 102/1326 = 8% chance I'm getting the worst of it here. Of these only AA has me in real bad shape. Against the other 92% of hands I'm about a 3:2 favorite. If I do fold, CO has two more hands to double up, otherwise I'm in the money."

Even after this exercise I could argue either way on the decision. Any other factors to consider?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-15-2005, 04:43 PM
TheMatador TheMatador is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: Bubble fold or all-in?

What I should have done is something like:
"Hmm, lets see, hands the BB could have that have me beat right now are any PP and AK, AQ, AJs. That's 3*2 (AA,JJ) + 6*11 (other PPs) + 12 (AK) + 16 (AQ) + 2 (AJs) = 102/1326 = 8% chance I'm getting the worst of it here. Of these only AA has me in real bad shape. Against the other 92% of hands I'm about a 3:2 favorite. If I do fold, CO has two more hands to double up, otherwise I'm in the money."

could you explain this math for me.

al
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-15-2005, 04:48 PM
bigredlemon bigredlemon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 544
Default Re: Bubble fold or all-in?

is there any rules against just typing "I have AJ and will show"?

I think that's against poker etiquette right?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-15-2005, 05:12 PM
MonkeeMan MonkeeMan is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin
Posts: 0
Default Re: Bubble fold or all-in?

There are 169 starting hands in HE. These are broken down into 13 pairs, 78 suited, and 78 non-suited. There are 6 combinations for each pair, 4 for each suited, and 12 for each non-suited, for a total of 1326 combinations. Since we have AJ there remain only 3 combinations for AA and JJ, and we also eliminate 4 AK and 2 AJs combinations.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-16-2005, 04:42 AM
curtains curtains is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 240
Default Re: Bubble fold or all-in?

I wish I knew exactly what to do in these situations. You know 100% that you will lose the hand with AJ because God wants to punish you by giving you a good hand when you really want to just autofold and watch your opponent bubble.
Anyway I don't know the answer, it requires some math I'm sure. Stacks are so high that your chances of getting higher than 4th if you win arent so great (although they are definitely there).
If you fold and your competitor survives his BB, then if you survive your BB, the onus is usually back on him.
Aj is what about 60-62% against random 2? Meanwhile your competitors chance of surviving the blinds should be well below 50%, and if he does survive them, you still can survive them in return, and its back in his corner.

(Probably you should call? Especially because difference between 3rd+4th is same as 4th+ bubble, thus just making the money isn't as important as a typical 1 table sit and go and this gives you more chance at the higher prizes, but I really don't know the answer)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-16-2005, 05:41 AM
raptor517 raptor517 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7
Default Re: Bubble fold or all-in?

put it in there, double up, double up again, 1 more time, and put yourself in contention to win.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-16-2005, 05:44 AM
curtains curtains is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 240
Default Re: Bubble fold or all-in?

The pay structure makes it more enticing to play the hand. In these events the jumps from 5th-4th and 4th-3rd and so on are all worth the same, whereas in a normal 1 table sit and go, the jump from 4th-3rd is worth twice that of 3rd-2nd.
If this were a 2 table step event on party with top 4 qualifying, this would be an easy fold.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.