Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-27-2005, 01:29 PM
ElSapo ElSapo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 1,415
Default Three-handed position with a good player

In a three-handed game with a bad player and a TAG, where do you prefer to be?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-27-2005, 01:33 PM
Megenoita Megenoita is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 199
Default Re: Three-handed position with a good player

[ QUOTE ]
In a three-handed game with a bad player and a TAG, where do you prefer to be?

[/ QUOTE ]

On the direct right of the Tag so that when the 4th player, etc. come, I have position on him [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].

M
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-27-2005, 01:35 PM
jba jba is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 672
Default Re: Three-handed position with a good player

awesome RGP thread with negreanu, lederer, arieh, and others tackling this question here
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-27-2005, 01:38 PM
Danenania Danenania is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 13
Default Re: Three-handed position with a good player

Fish on your right. This gives you position on the fish 2/3 of the time.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-27-2005, 03:35 PM
ElSapo ElSapo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 1,415
Default Re: Three-handed position with a good player

[ QUOTE ]
In a three-handed game with a bad player and a TAG, where do you prefer to be?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok, I guess I don't understand the answers. Three handed, it almost seems like it doesn't matter -- if I'm on his right, I have my SB when it's his BB, and button when it's his SB... I guess the question is, what situation makes the biggest difference?

Seems like I want the button when it's his BB, so that's on his left.

Sound right? I think someone said that, but that's my rationale.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-27-2005, 03:39 PM
jba jba is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 672
Default Re: Three-handed position with a good player

did you read that link or no?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-27-2005, 04:08 PM
GetThere1Time GetThere1Time is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ĄGAMBOOOOOOL!
Posts: 395
Default Re: Three-handed position with a good player

Fish on your right, TAG on your left.

From your button:
When it's your button, fish is in the BB and the TAG will fold more SBs to your raises and the fish will never fold a BB. You'll be HU with position on the fish a decent amount. If it's reversed than the fish is always calling out of the SB giving the TAG a better price to enter the pot and TAG has immediate position on the fish. Bad news for you.

From your SB:
If you're the SB, and the fish is the button he's going to limp sometimes letting you come in cheap and when he raises you can first isolate him. If the TAG is the button he has position on you and you drive the fish out to isolate the TAG. Then you're playing a pot OOP and not with your "target." If you just call, the tag's still in the best position to win a big pot from the donk unless you make a hand. And, of course, there's folding in the SB, which just sucks because the TAG is playing heads up with the fishy guy and you want his money

From your BB:
When I'm in the BB and the TAG's on the button, he'll be raising more and the SB donk will be cold calling more giving me 5:1 on my BB hands with immediate position on the donk. If the donk is the button you'll likely get more free play. Pots will be smaller. This isn't necessarily bad because it exaggurates the donks mistakes postflop, but a donks play is probably less terrible EV wise in a 3-handed game. For example, when he peels with a mid-range gutshot for 2 or 3 bets on the flop, its probably not as bad in a 3-handed game because his gutshot might have 2 overs to a winner with it, etc. So I'd rather play a big pot where I can isolate the donk than play a small one where I have to fold more to the TAG when he bets/or cr's before me.

So TAG left and fish right gives you the chance at the fishes money, IMO
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-27-2005, 04:20 PM
UncleSalty UncleSalty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Composing Vogon poetry
Posts: 513
Default Re: Three-handed position with a good player

I think this analysis is perfect. This situation isolates those factors that are most important when excercising proper table selection in a fuller game.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-27-2005, 04:24 PM
Victor Victor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: cleveland
Posts: 68
Default Re: Three-handed position with a good player

i want the tag on my left and the fish on my right.

now when im the button the tag will be folding most of his sb hands and i will be hu with the fish.

when i am the sb i can play more hands if the fish is passive and likes to limp on the button. if its a maniac fish then obviously this is null but also, he likely is not a fish at 3handed.

when i am in the bb i get nice odds to play against the tag and often the fish will be calling in the sb giving me a very nice overlay.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-27-2005, 04:28 PM
Victor Victor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: cleveland
Posts: 68
Default Re: Three-handed position with a good player

[ QUOTE ]
awesome RGP thread with negreanu, lederer, arieh, and others tackling this question here

[/ QUOTE ]

the funny thing about that thread is negreanu is wrong initially. apparently, us hush experts are better than him.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.