|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: A5s | |||
| Auto-fold |
   
|
27 | 62.79% |
| 3-bet only maniacs or people on tilt |
  
|
12 | 27.91% |
| 3-bet LAGs or oportunistic blind stealers |
  
|
3 | 6.98% |
| Automatic 3-bet |
  
|
1 | 2.33% |
| Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
12-02-2005, 01:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OOP v. cold-calling TAG
I never cold-call with any of these hands. Maybe that's why I'm so confused when another 'reasonable' player does it. I can possibly see it if you're fishing for a set with a mid/small pair and you expect 4+ players to take the flop, but Is there really a good reason to call with these suited K's and Q's? If you think you've got enough equity to play these against my range why aren't you 3-betting? You want to encourage the button and blinds to come along?
|
|
#12
12-02-2005, 02:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OOP v. cold-calling TAG
[ QUOTE ]
I never cold-call with any of these hands. Maybe that's why I'm so confused when another 'reasonable' player does it. I can possibly see it if you're fishing for a set with a mid/small pair and you expect 4+ players to take the flop, but Is there really a good reason to call with these suited K's and Q's? If you think you've got enough equity to play these against my range why aren't you 3-betting? You want to encourage the button and blinds to come along? [/ QUOTE ] Cold calling is a huge mistake that is often done by even "good" players. You should know this.
|
|
#13
12-02-2005, 02:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OOP v. cold-calling TAG
Right. The poll asked posters in this forum to report which hands they would cold-call in the given situation. I'm not sure who responded to the poll, but apparently there are serveral players around here who think cold-calling QJs is a good idea. Anyone who responded to the poll care to denfend this idea?
|
|
#14
12-02-2005, 02:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OOP v. cold-calling TAG
[ QUOTE ]
Right. The poll asked posters in this forum to report which hands they would cold-call in the given situation. I'm not sure who responded to the poll, but apparently there are serveral players around here who think cold-calling QJs is a good idea. Anyone who responded to the poll care to denfend this idea? [/ QUOTE ] What about the people cold calling with KQs or AJs! You don't need them to defend their opinion, just label them wrong!
|
|
#15
12-02-2005, 02:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: i see demons
I agree that checking the flop was a mistake, but I feel like I've lost all fold equity by now. I suspect I'm up against a pair, set or straight 1/3.75 times, so I am again reluctant to bet. The pot is tiny and the button is likely to check behind again, so it can't be a huge mistake to check again, can it?
And yes, my skirt is rather nice isn't it?
|
|
#16
12-02-2005, 02:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: i see demons
[ QUOTE ]
I agree that checking the flop was a mistake, but I feel like I've lost all fold equity by now. I suspect I'm up against a pair, set or straight 1/3.75 times, so I am again reluctant to bet. The pot is tiny and the button is likely to check behind again, so it can't be a huge mistake to check again, can it? And yes, my skirt is rather nice isn't it? [/ QUOTE ] I don't get how you think your flop check was a mistake, but then you think that their range on the turn is what you say it is. How have their ranges changed?
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
