Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-10-2005, 12:18 AM
pokerrookie pokerrookie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 400
Default Interesting PokerShare correspondence (LC)

Ever since I was banned at PokerShare for being from NA, I have sent repeated emails to ultimate bet and pokershare to find out whether they plan on giving the profit share to the players that have been banned. Most of my emails have gone unnoticed, or have been forwarded to the person most qualified to help. Anyway, this evening, I received an email from UB to check on the status of a purchase I made using the UB points I earned while playing at PokerShare. I sent the following and received the reply.

Email #1
Dear Sir,
Thank you for the book. Unfortunately, I am no longer
allowed at your tables for I am a North American
player. By the way, could you please let me know
whether or not I will be getting any bonus from the
40% profit sharing bonus at Pokershare?

Thanks
***********

The reply:
Dear Customer,

Thank you for contacting us.

You will be paid as per the usual guidelines and timeframe.

Feel free to contact us for any further information.

Best regards,

Glenn
Customer Service Department

An interesting twist, I think. I was under the impression that the 40% profit share money was long gone as far as we were concerned. Perhaps not.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-10-2005, 12:22 AM
Pokeraddict Pokeraddict is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 91
Default Re: Interesting PokerShare correspondence (LC)

After licensing, cashier fees, bonuses and affiliates how much is there left for your share without any players?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-10-2005, 12:25 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Interesting PokerShare correspondence (LC)

[ QUOTE ]
After licensing, cashier fees, bonuses and affiliates how much is there left for your share without any players?

[/ QUOTE ]

Just because they banned NA players doesn't mean all the profit they had accumulated vanished.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-10-2005, 12:29 AM
Pokeraddict Pokeraddict is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 91
Default Re: Interesting PokerShare correspondence (LC)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
After licensing, cashier fees, bonuses and affiliates how much is there left for your share without any players?

[/ QUOTE ]

Just because they banned NA players doesn't mean all the profit they had accumulated vanished.

[/ QUOTE ]

But I would be surprised if it covered all of the startup costs involved. The advertising, licensing, staffing, furnishings as well as all of the Neteller fees involved in deposits and cashouts as well as mailing all of those checks will be a hard startup cost to overcome with 90%+ of their player base gone.

I guess only time will tell.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-10-2005, 12:59 AM
Sniper Sniper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 704
Default Re: Interesting PokerShare correspondence (LC)

They were supposed to seed the 1st dividend with $1 million, regardless of profits.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-10-2005, 01:06 AM
Pokeraddict Pokeraddict is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 91
Default Re: Interesting PokerShare correspondence (LC)

Oh I did not know this, I wonder if they still plan on it. UB should have to seed it now.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-10-2005, 01:33 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Interesting PokerShare correspondence (LC)

You've got a point there. How long had they been operating before the NA player ban?

All I know is, if I were that Max Wright dude, I'd be looking into hiring some people to get revenge on UB for taking away my revenue.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-10-2005, 01:38 AM
Sniper Sniper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 704
Default Re: Interesting PokerShare correspondence (LC)

Max (Pokermanager@pokershare.com) has been fairly quiet about the whole thing, and took the pokershare forums down; which likely means that they are still negotiating with UB.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-10-2005, 01:45 AM
Sniper Sniper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 704
Default Re: Interesting PokerShare correspondence (LC)

Ron,

The most nefarious way to punish a poker room, would be for you and 50,000 of your closest friends to open accounts and make repeated deposits and withdrawals via neteller.

Make sure you buy some Neteller stock before you do so, to garner the rewards of your efforts [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-10-2005, 02:14 PM
StellarWind StellarWind is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 704
Default Re: Interesting PokerShare correspondence (LC)

[ QUOTE ]
Max (Pokermanager@pokershare.com) has been fairly quiet about the whole thing, and took the pokershare forums down; which likely means that they are still negotiating with UB.

[/ QUOTE ]
Have you seen what people were writing in those forums?

The forums needed to close because PokerShare's remaining customers and potential new customers were getting an eyeful.

PokerShare still needs to present itself and the Excapsa network as a good place to play.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.