|
|
|
|
#1
12-27-2005, 09:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Coach Reviews in Strategy Forums
As it stands now, the post is allowed as long as it's not a glaring advertisement and is unbiased (meaning pros/cons). In addition, it would need some sort of disclaimer that it's not an official 2+2 review. Several of us have voiced our concern with that type of disclaimer and hope that Mason will reverse that decision. If he's pressing to make a post now I'd send Mason a PM, ask him to review the thread again, and make a final decision.
|
|
#2
12-28-2005, 12:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Coach Reviews in Strategy Forums
Q,
I personally would be interested in Flair's review though I certainly agree that it would need a disclaimer re: Ciaffone's LHE advice. Flair's a great contributor to the forum and I think his comments on the value of coaching in general would be a valuable contribution to the forum.
|
|
#3
12-28-2005, 04:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Coach Reviews in Strategy Forums
[ QUOTE ]
Q, I personally would be interested in Flair's review though I certainly agree that it would need a disclaimer re: Ciaffone's LHE advice. Flair's a great contributor to the forum and I think his comments on the value of coaching in general would be a valuable contribution to the forum. [/ QUOTE ] Can you explain why you think it needs a disclaimer when this thread doesn't. While that isn't about Ciaffone, no posts in this thread have the disclaimer. Mason's reponse to Bobbyi makes it pretty clear that his post does not give the official 2+2 view. Furthermore is this post giving the official strategy of 2+2 publishing for how to play AQs when the flop is A48r, turn is J completing rainbow, river is T, one opponent is a total lag and the other is a tag that drops out after the flop gets raised? It doesn't have a disclaimer and the idiot making the post is even a mod. I have no clue why this post, or any other, should get a disclaimer. The situation is extremely similar to reviews of books in the book forum. Those never have had a disclaimer as far as I know. Strategy posts don't have a disclaimer. Articles published in the magazine have no such discliamer. Putting it into just this one post makes no sense. If it is necesary for this post please explain why it isn't necesary in the examples cited above.
|
|
#4
12-31-2005, 08:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Coach Reviews in Strategy Forums
FYI... Poker coaching thread in Psychology forum
|
|
#5
12-31-2005, 10:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Coach Reviews in Strategy Forums
That's some ad by Dan!
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
