NFL week 4 easy pickins pick.

[27offsuit]

-----After a non-covering home win, certain road teams have been weak. As described, these visitors have won only one game, while losing every spread decision in 10 seasons.



PS10-26 (34.9) – Play AGAINST a non-.500% road team with a TOTAL of 47 points or less off a home SU win of 2+ points and ATS loss scoring 28+ points as a favorite of 8 points or less in its last game.



SU: 12-1 (12.8) ATS: 13-0 (10.9)



YR / WK / TM / OPP / ST / LN / FIN / SU / MRG / ATS / MRG
1995 / 13 / DEN / TEN / A / -3 / 33-42 / L / -9 / L / -12
1995 / 16 / NE / PIT / A / +10 / 27-41 / L / -14 / L / -4
1996 / 12 / JAC / PIT / A / +10' / 3-28 / L / -25 / L / -14'
1996 / 13 / IND / NE / A / +6' / 13-27 / L / -14 / L / -7'
1997 / 11 / NYG / TEN / A / +3 / 6-10 / L / -4 / L / -1
1998 / 12 / JAC / PIT / A / +3 / 15-30 / L / -15 / L / -12
1999 / 2 / GB / DET / A / -5 / 15-23 / L / -8 / L / -13
2000 / 9 / GB / MIA / A / +4 / 20-28 / L / -8 / L / -4
2000 / 9 / MIN / TB / A / +3 / 13-41 / L / -28 / L / -25
2002 / 2 / GB / NO / A / -2' / 20-35 / L / -15 / L / -17'
2002 / 4 / DEN / BAL / A / -8' / 23-34 / L / -11 / L / -19'
2003 / 16 / TEN / HOU / A / -5 / 27-24 / W / 3 / L / -2
2004 / 17 / IND / DEN / A / +9 / 14-33 / L / -19 / L / -10



The St. Louis Rams are 3-point underdogs at the New York Giants on Sunday. The 2-1 Rams are off a 31-27 home victory over Tennessee last week, but failed to cover the 7-point spread. These parameters qualify St. Louis as the play-AGAINST team. For this PRO INFO SPORTS NFL POWER SYSTEM, the Play-ON team is the NY GIANTS. ------






That is all.........gl.

[27offsuit]

Easiest money of the day and not one reply.

Ah well.....

[scalf]

[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] nice results; and there probably is some handicapping value in a situation; but when there are so many restrictios; so few plays per season; it seems that there was cherrypicking to come up with this system to start with; and there should be some regression toward the mean...

kinda like we do not allow retrospectve studies to determine if a medication is valid; ya hafta actually say ya got a system; then play it; and take results then

gl

[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

[Uglyowl]

Hope the trend continues for you!

[ QUOTE ]
Play AGAINST a non-.500% road team

[/ QUOTE ]

So it can be above .500 or below .500, but not exactly .500??? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[27offsuit]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Play AGAINST a non-.500% road team

[/ QUOTE ]

So it can be above .500 or below .500, but not exactly .500??? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

So you're one of 'those' guys, huh?

Do a search of this forum for 'nit'.
Tag, you're nit!


Nit.......

No, honestly, what is it?

Better than .500?