Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Q9o?
Raise 32 13.06%
Fold 213 86.94%
Voters: 245. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-04-2005, 09:18 AM
dcarlc dcarlc is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 15
Default Canterbury 8/16, Preflop question

9 handed. This game is loose as they come.

5 limpers to me in hijack, I have pocket 9's, If I limp last 2 are coming in with almost any 2. If I raise I've got a chance at getting the button. Cutoff and button are regulars(more money than game). No matter what the action the blinds are coming in(Raise, Reraise no matter). More on hand a little later.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-04-2005, 09:21 AM
Arnfinn Madsen Arnfinn Madsen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 449
Default Re: Canterbury 8/16, Preflop question

You have to raise. Your hand is not better than that you want as few people as possible to compete with you for the blinds/ pot. QQ-KK-AA you could have limped for your reasons. QQ probably marginal.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-04-2005, 09:51 AM
Evan Evan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: sthief09: im kinda drunk from the nyquil
Posts: 1,562
Default Re: Canterbury 8/16, Preflop question

[ QUOTE ]
QQ-KK-AA you could have limped for your reasons.

[/ QUOTE ]
No way.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-04-2005, 10:03 AM
Arnfinn Madsen Arnfinn Madsen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 449
Default Re: Canterbury 8/16, Preflop question

Sorry, my bad. I misread OP, for some reason I thought folded to hero, of course QQ-AA should be raised in this scenario.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-04-2005, 10:06 AM
Arnfinn Madsen Arnfinn Madsen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 449
Default Re: Canterbury 8/16, Preflop question

Think it may involuntarily qualify my first post for worst advice ever. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-04-2005, 09:55 AM
sy_or_bust sy_or_bust is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 169
Default Re: Canterbury 8/16, Preflop question

I disagree. This is a huge multiway pot, where cutting down opponents is wishful thinking. You raise, but the primary reason is the pure profit from set value. If you can nab the button or catch a favorable non-set flop, that's nice too, but sets are most important, and most profitable, against a loose-passive field.

And you realize that limping AA/KK/QQ here gives up at least 7 small bets preflop, right?

You should raise preflop for value. Any pocket pair figures to win more than its fair share in an 8-10 handed pot, so it can raise profitably. Larger pairs win more often unimproved. The primary value of low-mid PPs now derives from sets and full houses, which is why 22 can raise here also. AA/KK win so often UI that sets are less important, but this has nothing to do with not raising. These hands are even more valuable to raise.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-04-2005, 11:47 PM
donny5k donny5k is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 184
Default Re: Canterbury 8/16, Preflop question

[ QUOTE ]
I disagree. This is a huge multiway pot, where cutting down opponents is wishful thinking. You raise, but the primary reason is the pure profit from set value. If you can nab the button or catch a favorable non-set flop, that's nice too, but sets are most important, and most profitable, against a loose-passive field.

And you realize that limping AA/KK/QQ here gives up at least 7 small bets preflop, right?

You should raise preflop for value. Any pocket pair figures to win more than its fair share in an 8-10 handed pot, so it can raise profitably. Larger pairs win more often unimproved. The primary value of low-mid PPs now derives from sets and full houses, which is why 22 can raise here also. AA/KK win so often UI that sets are less important, but this has nothing to do with not raising. These hands are even more valuable to raise.

[/ QUOTE ]
You realize if you "raise for set value" you're going to get around 7 to 1 pot odds on a ~7.5 to 1 shot? This thinking makes no sense. If you said you are raising so that people will be tied to the pot when you do flop a set, that's fine. But in this case people will be tied to the pot anyway because they are loose.

That said, 99 isn't purely a set value hand so I think this is a raise. However, 22 is NOT a raise.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-05-2005, 04:55 AM
somapopper somapopper is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 97
Default Re: Canterbury 8/16, Preflop question

[ QUOTE ]
You realize if you "raise for set value" you're going to get around 7 to 1 pot odds on a ~7.5 to 1 shot? This thinking makes no sense.

[/ QUOTE ]

B&M. Eight to the flop. If 8 more big bets don't go in this pot I'm an arabian monkey.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-04-2005, 09:58 AM
peterchi peterchi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Delaware/Michigan/Baltimore
Posts: 150
Default Re: Canterbury 8/16, Preflop question

[ QUOTE ]
You have to raise. Your hand is not better than that you want as few people as possible to compete with you for the blinds/ pot.

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm not really clear on what you're trying to say. We already have 5 limpers. I think that I would raise because it's fun, but I don't see what's so wrong with limping along for set value. You're gonna dislike about 70% of the flops that come, right?


[ QUOTE ]

QQ-KK-AA you could have limped for your reasons. QQ probably marginal.

[/ QUOTE ]
I don't understand this part at all.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-07-2005, 08:38 AM
Chris Daddy Cool Chris Daddy Cool is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 401
Default Re: Canterbury 8/16, Preflop question

[ QUOTE ]
but I don't see what's so wrong with limping along for set value. You're gonna dislike about 70% of the flops that come, right?


[/ QUOTE ]

you realize you'll dislike about 70% of the flops when you have AK/AQ right? so thats not a good argument for not raising 99.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.