#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for a new MicroPoster...
957
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for a new MicroPoster...
913.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for a new MicroPoster...
I have no idea what this is but the answer is 33
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for a new MicroPoster...
[ QUOTE ]
My suggestion is that if you plan on being heavy handed with the stats and nc threads, then it might be a good idea to sticky the respective posts. Long live MrWookie [/ QUOTE ] That's a good idea, but there's one problem. In order for a thread to be stickied, it, as per 2+2 regulations, must be locked. Since these threads must be able to take replies, this won't work. However, we will (and do) have links to both in the weekly digest with a reminder about what they're for. This should be a reasonable compromise. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for a new MicroPoster...
411
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for a new MicroPoster...
222
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for a new MicroPoster...
311
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for a new MicroPoster...
134
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for a new MicroPoster...
444
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for a new MicroPoster...
[ QUOTE ]
222 [/ QUOTE ] do you think the microposter(current, past, and future) have/had/will have a bias against already knowledgable posters getting the spot microposters, and therefor avoid picking certain numbers? |
|
|