#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 100/200 hands
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I dunno, you never take -ev or 0ev spots in your life? [/ QUOTE ] sure, i do it often. usually not for high stakes though. you won't see me playing blackjack in a casino for $1000 a hand. how do you see it as only slightly -ev or even 0 ev though? i'm just going by your own assessment that you "don't really know what's going on in limit poker". if that assessment is true, you're losing a lot of money playing your average 4 handed 100/200 on stars. [/ QUOTE ] I personally dont really know what is going on in limit as well... and would guess that in your avg 4 handed 1/2 game on stars i might be as much as -3bb/hr. However if i choose adequate games i can probably be ~0EV, and slowly learn more n more. Also the games can be entertaining. Although i do generally play 30/60 to "learn" instead of 1/2. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 100/200 hands
really lame response. you're usually much sharper. you're wrong on this one - your "my theory, young kid with too much money" is preceeded by "not trying to be a dick" - just transparent and foolish.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 100/200 hands
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 100/200 hands
Hand 1 you should probably fold to the flop check raise, turn is a super easy muck.
I like raising the turn in hand 2 for a free showdown. A lot of people like to make super thin value bets, but the point is, i really don't know that he is calling this river with a 77, 88 or ace high type hand. TT, JJ, or a queen are more than possible here. Hand 3 is fine. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 100/200 hands
Hand 1 I think you should fold to the flop raise.
Hand 2 is fine, although raising the flop is fine too. Hand 3 I think the river is though, but I could be convinced either way. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 100/200 hands
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I dunno, you never take -ev or 0ev spots in your life? [/ QUOTE ] sure, i do it often. usually not for high stakes though. you won't see me playing blackjack in a casino for $1000 a hand. [/ QUOTE ] I've never seen Daryn take a -EV spot, and that includes him betting $100 on hard 8 for like half an hour. The guy just can't lose money. -SmileyEH |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 100/200 hands
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I dunno, you never take -ev or 0ev spots in your life? [/ QUOTE ] sure, i do it often. usually not for high stakes though. you won't see me playing blackjack in a casino for $1000 a hand. [/ QUOTE ] I've never seen Daryn take a -EV spot, and that includes him betting $100 on hard 8 for like half an hour. The guy just can't lose money. -SmileyEH [/ QUOTE ] nice, but come on.. the dice were hot! |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 100/200 hands
Hand 1:
Once you call the turn you are committed to calling the end barring a spade coming. I think you have to call down here u/i. Hand 2: I think you played the hand well. Only hand Im worried about would be J's and I don't think he slows down with Jacks... possible but not likely in that game. Hand 3: Definitely need to bet on the end. He is certainly paying off with all A-high hands and probably some K-high hands. Definitely need to bet the end. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 100/200 hands
If you aren't opening on the button in a 4 handed game at that level you are definitely giving up way too much. I would definitely open with that hand there. You can not limp and folding feels wrong!
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 100/200 hands
[ QUOTE ]
Hand 3: Definitely need to bet on the end. He is certainly paying off with all A-high hands and probably some K-high hands. Definitely need to bet the end. [/ QUOTE ] The board is T4567. The flush draw got there. Even if he has KQ, the only hands he beats are KJ, K9, K2, QJ, Q9, Q2, J9, and J2. I don't think K high is calling on the end. |
|
|