Devastator on UB

[Horrible Player]

Have you watched the player on the 5000 NL table. I have never seen this player with less then 5k at the table. He has over 36k table right now (12:38AM 12/29/03)

[luckycharms]

Yeah, I've seen him play a bit. He was playing at the $25/$50 blind NL table at UB (max buy-in $5,000). He left with $49,000

[Horrible Player]

Well then he left this morning with another 46k at 9AM

[Zag]

I don't play on UB, so I can't comment on this player in particular, but I can say that you will never see me with more than a couple of dollars less than the buy-in on tables that I play. This is because I will continuously rebuy until I win a hand. It doesn't mean that I am always winning, just because I have over the buy-in. Last night I was showing $300+ on the $200 buy-in table, but I was down about $100. (Then I FINALLY caught some cards that held up, and was up into the high $400's.)

On the other hand, you won't often see me with 7 times the buy-in, either. I generally don't sit at the table long enough.

[Redhotman]

Thanks guys. I have been lucky the last couple of days. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[GrinningBuddha]

Redhotman = Devastator?

If those are your upswings, I'd hate to see your downswings. [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

[Ulysses]

I'm watching him play right now. Very interesting heads-up match. He's definitely not shy about putting the chips in the middle. He seems to play pretty well, though he pushes too much heads-up w/ weak draws on the turn. He's now up to $16k (he made two $5k buy-ins).

[theBruiser500]

I though redhotman was the devastator too, but then I looked at some of his previous posts. In one of his posts it sounds like he's talking about a $50 NL table, I really doubt he's the devastator.

[bugstud]

he's getting killed right now

[Horrible Player]

kind of funny, I did the same thing and looked up some of his posts