Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-03-2005, 06:33 PM
cagedman cagedman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Default Purely Formulaic SNG

What do you folks think of the possibility of making a profit a the 10+1, 20+1 (say, 5-10% ROI) with nothing more than a player-ignorant decision tree?

A purely formulaic approach.

Think it's possible?

It is for No Limit ring (25NL, tested over 750,000 hands). I've done it, and I'd be willing to share in exchange for a low level SNG decision tree.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-03-2005, 06:33 PM
pergesu pergesu is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: Purely Formulaic SNG

Yes, you can write a bot that will beat the $11s and $22s
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-03-2005, 06:40 PM
cagedman cagedman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: Purely Formulaic SNG

Care to discuss the general concept (strictly in regards to actual play)? The idea of formulaic bubble play seems complicated to me as a successful ring player and a semi-green SNG player.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-03-2005, 06:56 PM
flyingmoose flyingmoose is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 53
Default Re: Purely Formulaic SNG

Do a search for ICM. A bot would basically make all +$EV plays according to ICM, and that's all that's needed to beat the 11-33s.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-03-2005, 07:05 PM
cagedman cagedman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: Purely Formulaic SNG

It seems like the difficult part would be weighting the results of the ICM computations against the likely results of an action. It's difficult to put people on a range of call hands at this level, so it's difficult to determine the relative frequency of wins, losses, etc. (i.e. for a given push/fold scenerio)

Maybe this point is not important at this level? (i.e. if a play is profitable with a conservative hand distribution, then it will only be more so with poorer play)

Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-03-2005, 07:07 PM
Isura Isura is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 69
Default Re: Purely Formulaic SNG

[ QUOTE ]
It seems like the difficult part would be weighting the results of the ICM computations against the likely results of an action. It's difficult to put people on a range of call hands at this level, so it's difficult to determine the relative frequency of wins, losses, etc.

[/ QUOTE ]

Good points. But from my time experimenting with ICM, exact hand ranges don't change the EV of play that much. Basic tight, normal, and any two type ranges are all that are really necessary to figure out a reasonably accurate decision.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-03-2005, 07:09 PM
cagedman cagedman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: Purely Formulaic SNG

That's what I was hoping for.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-03-2005, 07:12 PM
flyingmoose flyingmoose is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 53
Default Re: Purely Formulaic SNG

By the way, if you're thinking about making a bot, I wouldn't advise it. Party is pretty good at catching them.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-03-2005, 07:21 PM
cagedman cagedman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: Purely Formulaic SNG

I'm not--more interested in a mindless strategy for massive multitabling...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-03-2005, 07:21 PM
pergesu pergesu is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: Purely Formulaic SNG

How massive is massive? Plenty of people here 8-table with somewhat mindless play, and a number of guys 12-table. Just takes some practice.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.