Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-03-2005, 07:24 PM
flyingmoose flyingmoose is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 53
Default Re: Purely Formulaic SNG

Who besides Raptor 12-tables?

Jesus, I don't even want to think about trying it. Playing 12 tables at the same time would make my eyes bleed.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-03-2005, 07:28 PM
pergesu pergesu is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: Purely Formulaic SNG

ZeeJustin does, and I'm pretty sure a couple other guys do too.

Not sayin it's easy...but people do it.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-03-2005, 07:32 PM
Freudian Freudian is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 24
Default Re: Purely Formulaic SNG

[ QUOTE ]
Do a search for ICM. A bot would basically make all +$EV plays according to ICM, and that's all that's needed to beat the 11-33s.

[/ QUOTE ]

A big weakness of ICM as it is, is that you have to guess as to what the others players range is (and often be wrong, which is often overlooked when people claim a call is +1.3% or whatever).

A player independent bot doing ICM calculations would be like a blind leading the blind.

Of course one could always assume a medium range and be slightly off most of the time, but it would still probably be able to play profitable SnGs at the lower limit. Just not optimal.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-03-2005, 07:41 PM
flyingmoose flyingmoose is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 53
Default Re: Purely Formulaic SNG

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Do a search for ICM. A bot would basically make all +$EV plays according to ICM, and that's all that's needed to beat the 11-33s.

[/ QUOTE ]

A big weakness of ICM as it is, is that you have to guess as to what the others players range is (and often be wrong, which is often overlooked when people claim a call is +1.3% or whatever).

A player independent bot doing ICM calculations would be like a blind leading the blind.

Of course one could always assume a medium range and be slightly off most of the time, but it would still probably be able to play profitable SnGs at the lower limit. Just not optimal.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree with you that it wouldn't be optimal, but I do think it could beat the god-awful 11 and 22 players for a decent clip.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-03-2005, 07:48 PM
Freudian Freudian is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 24
Default Re: Purely Formulaic SNG

If Saabpo could do it without postflop play, a bot knowing when to push or check/fold a flop would win more.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-03-2005, 08:34 PM
jeffraider jeffraider is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 27
Default Re: Purely Formulaic SNG

It's doable, but it would be a bunch more complicated than the NL Ring strategy that you've got. I think it would need to at least somewhat take into account the stack sizes of the other remaining players.

I'd like to see the NL Ring strategy one because I keep getting pwned at NL Ring.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-03-2005, 08:44 PM
Blackjack Blackjack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Searching for Luck
Posts: 941
Default Re: Purely Formulaic SNG

what was your rate in the 25 NL?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.