Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 05-10-2005, 05:54 PM
bicyclekick bicyclekick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 416
Default Re: Party adding more 30/60 tables..

My guess is to keep the games goin at 10/20 6max.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 05-10-2005, 06:08 PM
bobbyi bobbyi is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 14
Default Re: Party adding more 30/60 tables..

[ QUOTE ]
My guess is to keep the games goin at 10/20 6max.

[/ QUOTE ]
So you're saying that they do limit the number of 15/30 6max tables? Then shouldn't the waiting lists for the few they have be really long? The few times I've glanced at it, there were only a couple tables with fairly short lists (I think) which would seem to indicate a lack of demand.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 05-10-2005, 06:23 PM
bvaughn bvaughn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 42
Default Re: Party adding more 30/60 tables..

I see this as a natural progression as well...I just wonder how high could it go? As the "regulars" continue to build bankroll and search for higher games, how high could/would Party go to accommodate the high-limit "regulars"?
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 05-10-2005, 06:26 PM
Shoe Shoe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mil-town
Posts: 98
Default Re: Party adding more 30/60 tables..

[ QUOTE ]
I see this as a natural progression as well...I just wonder how high could it go? As the "regulars" continue to build bankroll and search for higher games, how high could/would Party go to accommodate the high-limit "regulars"?

[/ QUOTE ]

Quite frankly, I'm shocked that party doesn't have any games higher than 30/60. Perhaps they should add higher limits, but make you request permission to play in them like stars does or something. I would think the largest poker site on the internet would also have the largest games on the internet.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 05-10-2005, 06:35 PM
AlexM AlexM is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re: Party adding more 30/60 tables..

[ QUOTE ]

So you're saying that they do limit the number of 15/30 6max tables? Then shouldn't the waiting lists for the few they have be really long? The few times I've glanced at it, there were only a couple tables with fairly short lists (I think) which would seem to indicate a lack of demand.

[/ QUOTE ]

The wait lists don't end up long because people who want to play short handed just manufacture their own short handed tables with regular tables then leave if it fills up. Look at the number of regular 15/30 tables that have 6 or less players sometime. There are quite a few of them.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 05-10-2005, 06:48 PM
skp skp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Posts: 737
Default Re: Blind structure

When I played live poker at the Holiday Inn Great Canadian Casino, we would often set up "must straddle" games to get the games juiced up. At times, the line-up of players would be such that the straddle in fact had the effect of generating less action. I therefore suggested a "must call UTG" game and that worked great to generate action in what would otherwise have been a tough table.

So yes, I would really welcome a game with 3 blinds but my preferred structure would be 10,10,and 15 in the 15 games. A 5/10/15 structure would see the guy with the $5 blind hardly playing any hands.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 05-10-2005, 06:53 PM
bicyclekick bicyclekick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 416
Default Re: Blind structure

Interesting SKP. very interesting. I like your idea better.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 05-10-2005, 08:02 PM
Sully Sully is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 8
Default Re: Party adding more 30/60 tables..

After checking things out today, I have reached the conclusion that I think this sucks. One of the main reasons I started playing the 30/60 game was that you could sit at a table for a couple hours, and really start to get a read on your opponents. It took patience to get in the game, and once people got there, they tended to stay. For my game this was good, as I felt that I tended to just "play the cards" in the 15 game. I'm not a big dataminer, so this was a nice change. I relly felt like I was playing poker (or at least trying).

Last I counted, there were over 20 30/60 tables going...in five sessions, my table had broken up three times, meaning I needed to find a new table, learn new players, etc.

This is a personal bitch, and I may be thrilled with all of this in a month, but for now, I feel like someone built a ski lift on my favroite hidden backcountry run.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 05-10-2005, 08:02 PM
skp skp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Posts: 737
Default Re: Blind structure

Ya, I highly recommend the "must call UTG" game. Only thing though is that it requires some cooperation from all the players to make it work. For example, if a guy wants to go for a smoke, take a piddle etc., he has to either get back before his UTG hand comes up (to put his must call bet out there) or he has to stick out a whole round. So, if he misses his UTG hand to go powder his nose, he has to wait until he is UTG again to come back in. But the casino will make him post the big blind and small blind because he would have missed his regular blinds the previous round. Therefore, the arrangement we had was that the winner of that pot would return the small blind to our man who just returned from the can.

It all sounds complicated but actually it's quite simple in practice *SO LONG* as everyone understands the spirit of the arrangement and co-operates in its implementation.

Of course, the "must call utg" game is not the same as the 3 blinds game because UTG does not have the option of raising (unless you can somehow get your casino to agree that he can). Our casino would not allow that. UTG can make it 3 bets but not two.

Anyway, see if you can pull it off at your local barn. great structure IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 05-10-2005, 08:05 PM
skp skp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Posts: 737
Default Re: Party adding more 30/60 tables..

Good points. Games breaking up is a bitch. As is the constant revolving door in the 15 games. Poker is more enjoyable when you have got a rhythm going with a stable table.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.