|
|
|
|
#1
12-28-2005, 10:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What now?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Well, I've just had a three hour session on Pacific Poker 10/20 limit and I'm up $1000 [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Maybe I should stick to short-handed for a bit longer. [/ QUOTE ] SH is higher variance. 6500 is not a full roll for 10/20 limit. discretion at this point in your poker career is the far better part of valor. Barron [/ QUOTE ] So, the 300xBB rule doesn't apply to short-handed? [/ QUOTE ] I'm not sure of the exact rule of thumb for 6-max play, but I'd guess 500xBB at the absolute minimum. Those SH games can have some wicked variance, as evidenced by your +50xBB session. You could just have easily wound up on the losing end of that run... 
|
|
#2
12-28-2005, 11:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What now?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Well, I've just had a three hour session on Pacific Poker 10/20 limit and I'm up $1000 [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Maybe I should stick to short-handed for a bit longer. [/ QUOTE ] SH is higher variance. 6500 is not a full roll for 10/20 limit. discretion at this point in your poker career is the far better part of valor. Barron [/ QUOTE ] So, the 300xBB rule doesn't apply to short-handed? [/ QUOTE ] I'm not sure of the exact rule of thumb for 6-max play, but I'd guess 500xBB at the absolute minimum. Those SH games can have some wicked variance, as evidenced by your +50xBB session. You could just have easily wound up on the losing end of that run... [/ QUOTE ] Well, yes, I've been playing long enough to realize this and I have had some awful sessions of 6-max online. Thanks for the advice on bankroll, though. Guess I'll play it a bit safer now.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
