|
View Poll Results: What hands win big pots? | |||
others (J4 os) | 2 | 7.41% | |
one/two-gappers (like 86os) | 0 | 0% | |
suited connectors | 6 | 22.22% | |
big hands (QQ/AK-type) | 12 | 44.44% | |
small pairs | 7 | 25.93% | |
Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: pushing in the orange zone (PP$150)
You think a good player will call a 12xBB push w/22? I sure don't. Again, it gets back to the buy-in. But unless they have chips to spare or are desperate then I see them folding most of the small pairs - perhaps even up to 77s. And when you calcuate your equity against 88+, AQ+ it drops down to 35% although of course the chance of getting called decreases.
And it's not just a question of whether pushing is +EV. The question is whether or not pushing is the most +EV versus other alternatives. It may very well be but you need to consider all options and what you're opponents are likely to do if you just make a normal raise. What hands will they push with? What hands will they call with? You need to think about who is left to act after you and who is in the blinds. While in a STT there are lots of automatic decisions I think that's less the case in an MTT where there are many factors to consider. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: pushing in the orange zone (PP$150)
[ QUOTE ]
You think a good player will call a 12xBB push w/22? I sure don't. Again, it gets back to the buy-in. But unless they have chips to spare or are desperate then I see them folding most of the small pairs - perhaps even up to 77s. And when you calcuate your equity against 88+, AQ+ it drops down to 35% although of course the chance of getting called decreases. [/ QUOTE ] more often than not, this seems like an argument for a push vs. 3 BB raise. too lazy to do the math right now longhand (and don't have pokerstove at work) but, if one accepts that worse aces won't call a 3BB raise (especially at high buy-ins) but pairs < 88 will call a 3 BB raise but fold to a push, intuition would suggest that a push is +EV vs. a 3BB raise, ceteris paribus. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: pushing in the orange zone (PP$150)
At highly aggressive tables, would anyone consider limp/rr all-in, depending on the player who raises? I've never tried this, but I've heard lovely things about it...Obviously doomed to failure if limpers never get raised by the big stacks...
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: pushing in the orange zone (PP$150)
I went with the push... but that was after eliminating a couple of other factors that I would consider if it were actually me.
One of the main questions being, "How long left in this level?" If it's early in the level, I think I might be more inclined to wait. The reason I say this is because we are in MP now, we're moving towards EP and the blinds (therefore having the 'risk' of bigger hands calling us in EP as well having our M chopped up by the blinds.) If the level ends before we get to the blinds then our M is significantly different... no longer High Orange. If we can get to the blinds in this level, then our life in the blinds is a little easier and our M is spared for another round. In short I think it important to consider the lifespan of our current M. 10 has a heckuva lot more options than 5. |
|
|