Deranged made me forget Clarkmeister

[Octopus]

I had Deranged's recent post (link) on my mind when this hand came up. The villain here is completely different from the one in his hand, however.

Party 2/4 - 10 handed

Folded to me three off the button. I open with black tens. The button and the BB call. The button has yet to fold pre-flop in an orbit and a half.

Flop is Q52 all clubs. I bet and the button calls. BB folds.

Turn pairs 2s. I bet and button raises. I call.

River is 7 clubs. I check/call.

Thoughts on the river?

[jason_t]

You only apply Clarkmeister when you have the lead.

[pokerjunky]

Seems like you should have folded the turn if you weren't sure the ten of clubs would hold up on the river.

[livinitup0]

[ QUOTE ]
Seems like you should have folded the turn if you weren't sure the ten of clubs would hold up on the river.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would have called the turn and raised the river, but this is a great point.

[Octopus]

[ QUOTE ]
Seems like you should have folded the turn if you weren't sure the ten of clubs would hold up on the river.

[/ QUOTE ]

I wasn't even sure I didn't have the best hand on the turn. This villain could have anything.

Also, I do not remember anyhthing about being in the lead being a part of Clarkmeister's Theorem. It only required that 1) you are heads up, 2) you are out of position, and 3) a fourth flush card comes on the river.

[thejameser]

Clarkmeister's theorem as best i can remember is if headsup and a fourth card of a suit comes you bet no matter what cards you hold.

edit to mention the OOP thing.