Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-03-2005, 04:23 PM
car ramrod car ramrod is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17
Default Re: 88 playing against no overcards

[ QUOTE ]
Raise pf. Hand plays differently after that.


[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-03-2005, 04:29 PM
MrWookie47 MrWookie47 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ^^ That wookie
Posts: 1,485
Default Re: 88 playing against no overcards

The pot is small, and the straight draw is low, making it less likely. A raise here offers poor odds even to people calling one bet. Raising now is good.

Def. raise preflop.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-03-2005, 04:31 PM
Aviston Aviston is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 96
Default Re: 88 playing against no overcards

[ QUOTE ]
The pot is small, and the straight draw is low, making it less likely. A raise here offers poor odds even to people calling one bet. Raising now is good.

Def. raise preflop.

[/ QUOTE ]
I wasn't advocating not raising the flop, I was merely stating an argument could be made for waiting for the turn (and for a different reason than the OP stated). Personally, I raise this flop all day.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-03-2005, 04:36 PM
TheKentock TheKentock is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 13
Default Re: 88 playing against no overcards

I'm thinking about this hand from the standpoint of winning at showdown. Nobody is folding to the raise on the flop. So regardless, we're going to see a turn here. There are a lot of very bad turn cards for our hand, and only a few truly good ones. I think this is a situation where we have a best hand that is very likely to get cracked on the turn or river.

For this reason, I think we should wait to the turn before raising. Firstly, we get to see if the turn card has helped or hurt our hand. Secondly, the bet size is bigger, so we get more money in the pot when we are ahead. Finally, a turn raise after a flop call is a very scary move in the eyes of most players, which I think will frighten the other players into checking to us on the River. We can then make a decision to bet or check through based on the river card.

But I'm an idiot and you're a mod, feel free to rip me apart.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-03-2005, 04:46 PM
Aviston Aviston is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 96
Default Re: 88 playing against no overcards

Yep, that about sums up the argument I was expecting. Unfortunately, against random blind hands, there are very few cards that will increase our pot equity enough to warrant waiting for the turn to raise. We already have over 50% pot equity against two players. Raise the flop for value.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-03-2005, 04:49 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 88 playing against no overcards

[ QUOTE ]
We already have over 50% pot equity against two players.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow that really surprises me. How did you derive that figure?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-03-2005, 04:51 PM
Aviston Aviston is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 96
Default Re: 88 playing against no overcards

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
We already have over 50% pot equity against two players.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow that really surprises me. How did you derive that figure?

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm too lazy to do math, I Pokerstove'd it.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-03-2005, 04:54 PM
Rev. Good Will Rev. Good Will is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: failing computer science
Posts: 591
Default Re: 88 playing against no overcards

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
We already have over 50% pot equity against two players.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow that really surprises me. How did you derive that figure?

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm too lazy to do math, I Pokerstove'd it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Did you actually put them on a range of hands or did you just hit the "random" button?

Not saying we don't have alot of equity here, I'm just trying to prevent a bad habit forming of not putting opponnents on a range of hands
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-03-2005, 04:56 PM
MrWookie47 MrWookie47 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ^^ That wookie
Posts: 1,485
Default Re: 88 playing against no overcards

You're more than welcome to argue with me. Just because my name is green doesn't mean I can never post incorrect advice. However, here's another thing to consider. What turn cards are we waiting for? What cards will you raise? Even a deuce could be a danger. With hands played from the blinds, their hand ranges are incredibly large. We don't know necessarily that an A is doom or than a 2 is safe. All we really know is that the bettor almost certainly doesn't have two overcards. He likely has a pair, and he might have a straight draw of some sort, and he might have an overcard. What we do know is that we very likely have the best hand now, and we have an equity edge. Raising, in addition to being for value, will make the hand easier to play. If we get c/r'd on the turn, we can almost certainly fold. I like raising and betting (not raising, mind you) until someone says I should stop.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-03-2005, 04:56 PM
Aviston Aviston is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 96
Default Re: 88 playing against no overcards

[ QUOTE ]
Not saying we don't have alot of equity here, I'm just trying to prevent a bad habit forming of not putting opponnents on a range of hands

[/ QUOTE ]
I put the SB on a range of decent hands to complete the SB with. I put BB on random hands considering he got a free play from the BB.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.