#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Point of locking \"Lady Law Man\" post?
Reading the T&C is clearly for nerds
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Point of locking \"Lady Law Man\" post?
[ QUOTE ]
[censored]...Esteban, promise you won't hit me with a shoe. [/ QUOTE ] Oh, brother, you don't have to worry about me hitting you with a shoe. I claw people to death. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Point of locking \"Lady Law Man\" post?
[ QUOTE ]
Reading the T&A is clearly for nerds [/ QUOTE ] Didn't you schtupp one of the chubby girls? Thinking bout something else there tbach? Edit: you edited your post you sneaky little [censored]. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Point of locking \"Lady Law Man\" post?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Reading the T&A is clearly for nerds [/ QUOTE ] Didn't you schtupp one of the chubby girls? Thinking bout something else there tbach? Edit: you edited your post you sneaky little [censored]. [/ QUOTE ] lol. yeah i got to my post. i guess i don't usually write T& and then not finish with A. mental slip. fruedian perhaps |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Point of locking \"Lady Law Man\" post?
[ QUOTE ]
I think your prank thread should be locked, and should have been locked immediately. Too many posts with information that could be used to seriously hurt someone or their property. Some joke. [/ QUOTE ] Agree. Like that one where the guy was talking about making a car windshield susceptible to shattering. I can already see some numbnuts trying to sue 2+2 because they think it's promoting that type of behavior (ah, the joys of a litigious society). Lady Law Man: Stupid? Yes. Waste of time? Yes. Harmless? Yes. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Point of locking \"Lady Law Man\" post?
[ QUOTE ]
It's quite obviously against the Terms and Conditions: [ QUOTE ] you may not post or transmit any ... threatening, ...profane, or otherwise objectionable information of any kind; including ...any transmissions constituting or encouraging conduct that would ... give rise to civil liability [/ QUOTE ] Good move, mods! [/ QUOTE ] Do we really want to start discussing this? As stated before, if you really think this was worse than the prank thread, you're way wrong. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Point of locking \"Lady Law Man\" post?
aherave-
you are clearly a man who knows how to live life. what do you say we go on a double date? |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Point of locking \"Lady Law Man\" post?
The proper way to handle this:
Ike, STFU. Tina is 10 times more talented than you. No lock needed. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Point of locking \"Lady Law Man\" post?
[ QUOTE ]
As for pokerjo, if you act like a woman, i will treat you like one! dont make me take my sneaker off bitch! [/ QUOTE ] shrug, calling out a specific poster is somewhat uncool. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Point of locking \"Lady Law Man\" post?
[ QUOTE ]
Give me a break. He's telling other posters he's going to "keep all hoes in check", warning them "don't make me take my sneaker off", and saying he'll "whack a dude upside the head". BTW, I don't mind people expressing their opinions about any moderator action. But, keep it in one thread. Nobody wants OOT to turn into the Comment on Moderator Actions Forum. [/ QUOTE ] Looks like the SS to me |
|
|