|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Post deleted by Mat Sklansky
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A very very well played hand, 200-400 on UB
Why isn't this a split?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A very very well played hand, 200-400 on UB
[ QUOTE ]
Why isn't this a split? [/ QUOTE ] AKQ88 beats AK887.... gotta stop posting this late doug |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A very very well played hand, 200-400 on UB
heh.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A very very well played hand, 200-400 on UB
[ QUOTE ]
Why isn't this a split? [/ QUOTE ] lol, quit drinking and posting [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A very very well played hand, 200-400 on UB
River is a work of art. I like it.
I have a question about preflop, what was reasoning behind not 3 betting this particular time? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A very very well played hand, 200-400 on UB
[ QUOTE ]
I have a question about preflop, what was reasoning behind not 3 betting this particular time? [/ QUOTE ] Leaving tempo aside...I assume it's an issue of play balancing/Shania. He is probably defending 85-100% of his hands and by calling with strong hands X% of the time it may improve the winrate of all his calling hands more than it costs him by playing AQo suboptimally sometimes. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A very very well played hand, 200-400 on UB
so what i see this stuff all the time on 5-10 party heads up games. the river is perfect because the K and the board will freeze him up and he'll just call often with some better hands and always with A high. but i think you lost some value on earlier streets but not putting in more action with the likely winner. you couldve:
reraised preflop let it go 3 bets on the flop c/red and called the turn i think you left a some chips in his stack on this one. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Post deleted by Mat Sklansky
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A very very well played hand, 200-400 on UB
"And no, I there is almost never any play of this caliber at the 5-10 HU on party."
there is when i play although maybe not because i wouldve spewed on the earlier streets and assumed it was for value. anyway the point i was mainly making was the river bet was a standard value bet. i mean it's exceptional compared to the normal donkness online but standard for a very good player. that's a pretty looking board for AQ in a heads up match. you should definitely leave the results out of your initial posts. it's perfectly possbile that clouded my response. it's best to reveal the results later in the thread, if ever. |
|
|