|
|
#31
08-30-2005, 10:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The art of retouching
It says gorie's a lousy photoshopper [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
That and you have a fairly realistic idea what women look like in real life. Jesus H Christ I'm especially retarted this morning. 
|
|
#33
08-30-2005, 11:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The art of retouching
Yeah, I hate the "gold sheen" they give to black chicks, who looked perfectly hot in the original and very odd in the touched.
|
|
#34
08-30-2005, 11:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The art of retouching
I've got a great pic of me and my bro in law, semi-profesionally done to make us both look like chip-and-dale dancers
|
|
#35
08-30-2005, 11:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The art of retouching
Soooo not necessary. These women are fine. I hate these airbrushed photos, the skin doesn't even look real.
I thought it was funny, how they added a little highlight and color to the dog in one.
|
|
#36
08-30-2005, 01:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The art of retouching
[ QUOTE ]
What does it say if I prefer the original? [/ QUOTE ] i don't know, i didn't say one is better than the other, i was just trying to show the difference. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] plus yeah i suck at retouching. actually i'm sure the original has some type of retouching done to it as well. negative retouching has been around a long time. i wonder when in time they started cutting women in half though.
|
|
#39
08-30-2005, 01:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The art of retouching
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] original:  new:  [/ QUOTE ] What does it say if I prefer the original? [/ QUOTE ] That you aren't a pedophile.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
