Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Did the addition of the 75/150 blind level change the average length of time each 10+1 stt takes?
yes 25 71.43%
no 10 28.57%
Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-08-2005, 01:53 AM
Mr_J Mr_J is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 639
Default Re: 109 interesting spot.. POLL TIME!!

Eh, push or fold, but I think limping is terrible. You might as well just type "free 300 for whoever pushes".

I have NO experience at the $109s but I vote push. You should have pretty damn good FE vs the bigstack, and I can't see how those shorties will be loose enough to make this unprofitable.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-08-2005, 01:56 AM
Daliman Daliman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 382
Default Re: 109 interesting spot.. POLL TIME!!

[ QUOTE ]
Fold.

If it's suited I shove.

Yugoslav

[/ QUOTE ]

Really, either fold or shove works here, i'd say it's about = EV either way.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-08-2005, 02:08 AM
microbet microbet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,360
Default Re: 109 interesting spot.. POLL TIME!!

[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]Gigabet [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] posted about liking to push from the CO.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-08-2005, 02:14 AM
microbet microbet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,360
Default Re: 109 interesting spot.. POLL TIME!!

I do that a fair amount too, but was never too sure about it. Definitely bad if the big stack is aggro here.

I wouldn't really think you gain FE, but you don't really lose much and maybe give yourself another way to either win more chips if called and you hit, or fold if big stack wakes up.

edit: I voted push.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-08-2005, 02:19 AM
Mr_J Mr_J is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 639
Default Re: 109 interesting spot.. POLL TIME!!

"You'd rather be in the CO than BTN for an open push? No way"

I would be if being it gained enough FE to overcome the position.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-08-2005, 02:20 AM
NegativeEV NegativeEV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 118
Default Re: 109 interesting spot.. POLL TIME!!

But you also know that a lot of 2nd stacks will make silly raises when the blinds are shorties and a big stack is in between because they want to play the shorty without tangling with the big stack. This is why the big stack can resteal push here against a lot of bad players. Your play might be too crafty and might get any 2 shoved by a lot of big stacks. I would shove over a minraise as the big stack if multitabling against an unknown in this spot with these stacks.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-08-2005, 02:23 AM
zipppy zipppy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Minneapolis, 20+2
Posts: 236
Default Re: 109 interesting spot.. POLL TIME!!

How much of an affect does the number of people left have on the aggressiveness of the big stack?

It seems like a really solid big stack would (should?) be more aggressive against a minraise from the 2nd highest stack on the bubble, but with 5 left usually big stacks are glad to see other players tangle, or small stacks get smaller.

that said, I voted push. I think the big stack is tighter at this spot in the tourney, and the small stacks are looser, making either minraise or push +ev. The minraise (as irie pointed out) leaves you room to get out if big stack hit a hand.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-08-2005, 02:32 AM
Irieguy Irieguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 340
Default Re: 109 interesting spot.. POLL TIME!!

[ QUOTE ]
I would shove over a minraise as the big stack if multitabling against an unknown in this spot with these stacks.

[/ QUOTE ]

So would I. Fortunately, we don't play us very often.

Most players aren't multitabling, so they'll notice when I min-raise for the first time all SNG when I've been pushing since level 4.

Everything you say is true... but I think it works more often than you think, and you just need to know when you can't do it. (and then you push here, of course.)

Irieguy
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-08-2005, 02:56 AM
ilya ilya is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Party Poker
Posts: 460
Default Re: 109 interesting spot.. POLL TIME!!

I would fold....I put big stack on 88+, AJ+; SB on default-Average; and BB on default-Loose, and I got +0.5 when discounting 50% for next BB/SB. Seems to me the blinds are more likely to be looser than tighter than these ranges, hence the fold....I dunno, I guess Irie and deathpotato and the rest of the guys who said push think the villains will be tighter than the ranges I specified? Or do you think +0.2-+0.5 here is enough to make pushing very clear?
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-08-2005, 03:07 AM
pearljam pearljam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 130
Default Re: 109 interesting spot.. POLL TIME!!

[ QUOTE ]
Eh, push or fold, but I think limping is terrible. You might as well just type "free 300 for whoever pushes".

I have NO experience at the $109s but I vote push. You should have pretty damn good FE vs the bigstack, and I can't see how those shorties will be loose enough to make this unprofitable.

[/ QUOTE ]

was joking, i voted push
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.